Message from @Unkn0wnNinja
Discord ID: 341149698146697216
*billion
Personally, I think it's a mixture of foreign aid, and the people already there using their children as labour
*billion
foreign aid is a mistake
Much worse.
Tell me how you will exterminate 8 billion people.
Do you have that many bullets?
You don't need to use bullets
and who said we would kill them?
megaAIDS
Tell me.
Disease would be the easiest way
You're the anti-natalist, we don't want to kill people
I don't want to kill either
I am intrigued on your solution ideas, but how do you propose solutions without a known cause?
why are we jumping to killing just now?
Instead of feeding them set up the technology for them to provide for themselves
I do think we need less ppl
but specifically less third worlders
I am anti-natalist. Which why I am so curious. But I also think all life should die, so that no future sentience can evolve to suffer our levels. Well... there is one other option.
In the long run it would
Sterilization in the form of a disease
And save us money
How so?
or a disease that outright kills
CRISPR, genetic engineering
Politics nowadays makes this sort of thought extremely taboo
and in line with the fascist thinking of the Nazi's
Because they cannow have as much children as they want without consecuese, we pay for them
If they have to provide for themselves it would drop because they'd be providing for those children
@Deleted User I view that as inhumane, wrong, and disgusting.
Most would
@Timo))) that doesn't fix the problem, it just allows them to sustain the large sums of children.
Besides Africa can grow all it want, just keep them out of Europe
The only other options beside extinction is a future where no suffering exists anywhere in the universe.
>when there is problems in a society but you don't understand them well so you get confused and decide to kill everyone
Lmaoing at you if you think giving free money doesn't make them have more children
There are two goals for life.
You didn't say free money
>what is a welare queen