Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 341153229465190401
except only in the western world
i think overpopulation lies solely in the third world
where unsustainable population growth prevails
which will eventually leak into our countries
>I think ....
Don't even start a sentence with this shit if your opinion is backed up by facts anyways
It's an opinion on whether we should or shouldn't have more ppl
so it can be used
>overpopulation lies [almost] solely in the third world
there you go, I turned vague shit into a factual statement
how is overpopulation prevalent in other parts of the world?
where population growth is negative?
the `almost` is only there to prevent making a blanket statement which can be disproved using a single exception
one second world country (such as China) with a population problem would disprove it
'second world'
not the third world
>how is overpopulation prevalent in other parts of the world?
I gave you an example, what else do you want
Except their population growth is slowing
China is shrinking though, 1.57 children per woman
posted earlier by you
and then you see the third world
population decline or stagnation doesn't imply that there isn't a population problem
it only implies that the problem is eventually being solved
Or already in the process of being solved
whilst the third world remains in a state of chaos with their high population growth
Tbh I would almost put China in the third world
that's because you don't know shit about China
They weren't ever rly aligned with russia
they hated russia's guts
and so did the russians
>11.2 trillion USD GDP
>I would almost put China in the third world
>ignoring half of their pop in poverty
>ignoring that their high gdp is the result of having an incredibly large pop
^
ty
>poorer than russia
There is a lot more than poverty required to classify a country as third world
Hi, bruce. You're very active and dedicated. We appreciate you effort on this serve. How else can I help you today?