It's just so... extensive.
Google it.
Maybe tomorrow.
I explain too much on this server. I'm on my break.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability#Criticisms
🦆
Haha
This wiki is okay for doing the criticisms.
As you can see there is like 10 parts.
wikipedia is underrated, you can go as deep as you want with their references
Meh
It's not 'deep as you want' but if you are a lazy fuck its OK
Just dont tell the nazi's I said that.
just don't use it for a conclusion
It's a good start
I like Karl Popper.
it can get you in the right path but you need to be using actual material for any real conclusion
He is really good.
But he makes mistakes.
wikipedia is just an aggregate
That is the most painful part of studying philosophy.
I didn't have much of a father, and I put high hope in powerful idea.
Nietzsche was my first nigger dad.
All jizz and no caress.
Who would you say is your favourite thinker
The most eye opening person
Hmmm...
only the technocrat himself
My favourite is not necessarily the best philospher.
My dadfu is Aquinas.
what do you mean by calling them dad
some gay thing
What?
No, Thomas makes me feel the best, his ideas never get old and they never run out.
ye but why "dad" 🤔
Because I needed it.
My dad was never around.
hmm
How else should someone deal with abandonment than God?
getting fat on coca cola and overdosing on anime?
why can't you be a normal westerner
