You don't need a state for a church.

The state as it currently formed may be unjust in his eyes; while other functions of civil and western society aren't.

Such as the Church and family.

Wherever a large amount of people come together, they inevitably form hirarchies which turn into a government.

anarchism
ˈanəkɪz(ə)m/Submit
noun
belief in the abolition of all government and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion.

Anarchy is a volatile state.

all organization of society

Anarchy only works up to like 150 people (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number)

That is more like indivdualistic anarchism

Egosim.

Stop the strawman please. Under your definition, anarchy would violate the individual as existing.

you're destroying everything

No.

The extreme of social darwinism; ridding of any state which creates fairness.

Is the individual an organized social structure?

no

it isn't

Read our manifest before you start talking shit.

But I'll have to make a video version first.

You want to destroy everything that is good

The family is. The Church is. The milita is. Small towns are.

To reduce it to a time which was the stagnation of all progress

isn't your manifest only like 2 pages long?

She gets it.

Yep. And we only drafted it 2 days ago.

It will be much longer.

>can't have organized papers

Why not?

It's not primitivism, for the 100th time.

>anarchism isn't primitivism

may as well call it that

Definations on book matter not; how anarchism really works for every-

Okay; listen.

you're going to devolve into it

Anarchism shall overcome our entire species at some point.

Are we?

almost definitely

So to what extent would you allow governments to exist, Chopin?
Obviously people form some form of local governments when they come together in groups.

anarchy will result in devolution

You're just talking shit at this point.