Message from @Timo)))

Discord ID: 342749216453427210


2017-08-03 19:13:25 UTC  

they need to inject more hormones

2017-08-03 19:13:32 UTC  

if you were able to genetically modify yourself to become immortal, would you refuse to do it because it's "degenerate"?

2017-08-03 19:13:33 UTC  

slice things off

2017-08-03 19:13:37 UTC  

drill more holes

2017-08-03 19:13:47 UTC  

yes I would, not only because it is degenerate though

2017-08-03 19:13:57 UTC  

If you were able to give yourself double strength through one injection without any visible alteration to your body, would you not do it?

2017-08-03 19:14:05 UTC  

no, I wouldn't

2017-08-03 19:14:14 UTC  

Being immortal is a living hell that you can't escape

2017-08-03 19:14:21 UTC  

this

2017-08-03 19:14:51 UTC  

You could always kill yourself and you'd most likely just die by getting hit by a car or something

2017-08-03 19:14:56 UTC  

I am only talking about preventing aging

2017-08-03 19:15:22 UTC  

I'd take the live forever injection no doubt about it

2017-08-03 19:15:54 UTC  

If I get to be 23 forever that is, no brainer

2017-08-03 19:17:33 UTC  

I'll take no aging and superhuman strength over not being called "degenerate" by some kids online.

2017-08-03 19:18:41 UTC  

I'm not a fan of Stirner but i'll call people who yell degeneracy at everyone spooked out of their mind

2017-08-03 19:19:57 UTC  

@Timo))) forever 23 is painful. Too much emotion at this age still. 27 is of better.

2017-08-03 19:20:26 UTC  

Yeah I'd probbly wait 4 years to take it

2017-08-03 19:20:33 UTC  

IQ begins to decline at an age of ~21, if you're going to live for thousands of years, that might matter more

2017-08-03 19:21:14 UTC  

Better halt aging when your body is at peak physical performance

2017-08-03 19:22:40 UTC  

Don't think it would make that much of a difference at all

2017-08-03 19:23:01 UTC  

Sporters tend to peak at 27

2017-08-03 19:23:13 UTC  

Intellectuals are never at their best at 21

2017-08-03 19:23:29 UTC  

Might be true but sounds overstated

2017-08-03 19:23:49 UTC  

@Deleted User peak performance is not measured in IQ. You need to consider neuroplasticity, developed regions of the brain later in life, developed self-awareness at older age and million of other things.

2017-08-03 19:25:58 UTC  

Lower strength of impulses in older brain is also more favourable in less extreme conditions.

2017-08-03 19:26:07 UTC  

Lower emotion.

2017-08-03 19:26:34 UTC  

You don't need to fight in caves any more.

2017-08-03 19:28:17 UTC  

If you work on yourself you only become better with age. Unless you hit 35+ where the decline is in every aspect.

2017-08-03 19:36:31 UTC  

I hope Chopin will spend his last years of high performance not entirely on agrarianism.

2017-08-03 19:37:18 UTC  

^^^

2017-08-03 19:37:33 UTC  

He'll spend it on alcoholism

2017-08-03 19:45:21 UTC  

The intellectuals of our lifetime becoming the most talented potato pickers in the world

2017-08-03 19:46:19 UTC  

Also IQ is funny. What if there is a person with slower problem solving skills but better precession and greater power of will? This man can solve 10x problem in a day due to endurance capabilities alone.

2017-08-03 19:46:49 UTC  

You can waste a high IQ no problem

2017-08-03 19:46:54 UTC  

you can develop a greater power of will, you can't just improve your IQ

2017-08-03 19:47:05 UTC  

Will sting that much more than a regular guy who achieves nothing too

2017-08-03 19:47:14 UTC  

@Deleted User most people don't.

2017-08-03 19:47:59 UTC  

Possibility is not actuality.

2017-08-03 19:48:30 UTC  

lol you don't think people discipline themselves?

2017-08-03 19:49:05 UTC  

Not many do.

2017-08-03 19:49:38 UTC  

Doesn't matter, they do more often than someone improving their IQ