Message from @frie

Discord ID: 344178054450642945


2017-08-07 17:57:39 UTC  

I may as well make this my username

2017-08-07 17:57:39 UTC  

And you don't even know why it implies it

2017-08-07 17:57:40 UTC  

"is a more predominantly (*if not exclusively*) capitalistic feature"

2017-08-07 17:57:44 UTC  

@Deleted User "exploitation and domination of other nations is a capitalist phenomenon"

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/344177308610985994/300px-EasternBloc_BasicMembersOnly.png

2017-08-07 17:57:46 UTC  

<:thronking:321284126332420097>

2017-08-07 17:57:48 UTC  

IF NOT EXCLUSIVELY

2017-08-07 17:58:01 UTC  

hurr durr I don't know, i just did the research but what do I know?

2017-08-07 17:58:18 UTC  

Like the image above says, it's blatantly not the case

2017-08-07 17:58:22 UTC  

@frie delet

2017-08-07 17:58:26 UTC  

<:pandabbing:250341158516031488>

2017-08-07 17:58:43 UTC  

Such a wrong statement smh

2017-08-07 17:58:48 UTC  

incentives for exploitation was the purpose of the article

2017-08-07 17:58:54 UTC  

And you expect me to read such trash

2017-08-07 17:58:56 UTC  

not scope or scale

2017-08-07 17:59:02 UTC  

Trash you posted

2017-08-07 17:59:23 UTC  

military exploitation

2017-08-07 17:59:26 UTC  

is what it said

2017-08-07 17:59:32 UTC  

Which is 100% wrong

2017-08-07 18:00:02 UTC  

US intervention in Vietnam to expunge communist elements hostile to their economic influence

2017-08-07 18:00:26 UTC  

the US intervention in Vietnam was to preserve the independence of South Vietnam

2017-08-07 18:00:42 UTC  

This is why the primary goals of all peace efforts was the preservation of South Vietnam, rather than the annexation of North Vietnam

2017-08-07 18:00:48 UTC  

no uh it's so they can make shekels t. mental manlet

2017-08-07 18:01:09 UTC  

<:shekels:341025620781826050>

2017-08-07 18:01:10 UTC  

thus had nothing to do with US access to Asian markets or the South China sea

2017-08-07 18:01:13 UTC  

mhm

2017-08-07 18:01:17 UTC  

wee woo

2017-08-07 18:01:18 UTC  

wee woo

2017-08-07 18:01:19 UTC  

strawman detected

2017-08-07 18:01:40 UTC  

"the US intervention in Vietnam was to preserve the independence of South Vietnam"

2017-08-07 18:01:45 UTC  

that was the only reason, you implied

2017-08-07 18:02:12 UTC  

Do you think the U.S raped south korea for their resources?

2017-08-07 18:02:24 UTC  

or was that the chinese that did it in north korea?

2017-08-07 18:02:59 UTC  

The U.S. had never preserved the independence of Asian nations or restored capitalism in those nations for personal gain

2017-08-07 18:03:02 UTC  

The US has an effective client state in South Korea conducive to their financial motives

2017-08-07 18:03:04 UTC  

Japan is an excellent example of this

2017-08-07 18:03:16 UTC  

And south korea benefited heavily

2017-08-07 18:03:38 UTC  

The U.S. allowed cheap Japanese exports to flood American markets, while simultaneously allowing and even encouraging Japanese tarriffs to ensure that Japanese markets remained closed to foreign goods

2017-08-07 18:03:51 UTC  

so their motive wasn't independence? a convenient consequence I suppose?

2017-08-07 18:04:02 UTC  

bruh are you guys seriously arguing about imperalism right now

2017-08-07 18:04:10 UTC  

How is South Korea a U.S. puppet state?

2017-08-07 18:04:17 UTC  

I said client state