Chopin is alright

We will see tomorrow. @Timo))) @Deleted User

What even is his economic views?

centrally planned?

because if so that's going to be fun

@Firefly#9983 USSR isnt le "real communism" tho, also isnt USSRchan underage

Whatever you think your strongest hand is.

@Deleted User ROADS

>ussrchan
>underage
my inner chad sees opportunity

wow so vague and misterious

You have a commie bogeyman in your head. I can personify that nightmare for you.

Nah srsly thogh, if I stay on this server will I ever meet people discussing left wing politics/ideology or am I just wasting my time?

I literally asked you what your economic views are

don't twist my words

You love dancing around questions

@Apollo'sJest maybe

just maybe

@Apollo'sJest This question presumes that the alternative to government-monopolized roads would have to produce an outcome very similar to the status quo in order to be acceptable. Is that really so? Part of the libertarian proposition here is that government is terrible at serving people's needs, often doing the exact opposite of what would have solved the problem. The market may come up with a transportation regime quite different from what you see today.
But for the sake of argument, let's assume the market produces the same outrageous sprawl of roadways the government produced...
Would tollbooths be installed every 10 miles?
Do you make micropayments to different ISPs every ten minutes on Netflix? No, the various firms involved in bringing the content to your home across thousands of miles of wire have negotiated with one another ahead of time. You pay a flat rate to one service provider, and they handle the other complexities for you. This is capitalism, remember. Everything revolves around making it easy for the consumer. Tollbooths at every intersection would be idiotically inconvenient. In the same way the market can present to you a pencil -- whose ingredients came from all corners of the Earth -- for a single low price, the ability to travel far and wide can be organized and sold to you as an easily digestible commodity as well.

@Apache14 Fuck your answer... 1) S'useless 2) U a weeb

I stopped caring about economics, its very theoretical. I only care about what is achievable. There is nothing inherently invalid about central planning, especially given progress.

@Deleted User Learn to take a meme

well what do you want to achieve then?

I'd love s traight answer

We can talk about this tomorrow. I am on mobile.

Try to be less vague tomorrow, I beg you

Lol "cuckposting"

Szekely?

I am an anarchist. I do not care about economics. But I am familiar with Soviet literature.

thats a hungarian ethnic group in romania

whats a cuck doing mentioning Szekelys

Anarchism, good to know, I assume you know my general positions, right?

I can argue for ML for debate purposes.

No only argue for things you actually believe in

It will be a short discussion.

why?

flaws of anarchism are plenty

One can hold many ideas as valid, and argues for them all while preferring certain ideas.

Sure you can, I'm just not interested in it

So, there is no "what you really believe in"