In short, the best way I can explain it, is that the workers would rise up to take the means of production from the elite. Then go on to have workers directly manage these, as opposed to the state or 'just small business men'.

Rename the server to "my girlfriend loves Jamal's dick"

@Deleted User Most people would call me a monarchist. What's your insult of the day against that?

incel whats the ultimate red pill?

"my girlfriend loves Jamal's dick"
- @Deleted User 2017

Monarchies worked for hundreds upon hundreds of years and didn't result in millions of deaths

ahahahahaha

White people conquered the world under a pseudo-monarchy

*O y v e y*

being this ignorant

*O Y V E Y*

@Anglican How is that different from a marxist revolution?

At least within myself, I am not a revolutionary like them.

@Deleted User I asked you to inslt me not to suck my dick you perv

I'm a fascist basically. Although i don't support any one fascist tendency.

Dieselcuck with the ad hominem but zero substance response because the little brainlet knows I'm right

@Anglican So how would the workers get the means of production than?

Well, there's serveral paths!

Fucking leave the Capitalist shhistem.

*shitsem

Workers actively aiming to strike it a new within the Co-op sector, giving a good middle finger to the Juden in power.

@Anglican Oy vey... Shut it down!

Or, the state could simply encourage it, and after a set number of hours, lead to legastlating against the Capitalist structure.

Or, if worst comes to worst.

You'd have to practice popular revolution.

>legastlating

Holy fuck

Brainlet

I can't spell.

Legislating

Jesus fuck

I have no excuse.

Not shut up.

*now

F u c c

@Anglican What if certain workers do particularily well, amass wealth and become new de facto capitalists? How would you prevent that if u even would?

Oh! It's simple, you don't. The thing about this is because they couldn't become capitalists.

Stfu weaselboi

why?

@Deleted User would you believe me if I told you I used to think like you?

Sure