Read Wittgenstein

Peano is maths.

So when you try to claim that morality doesn't exist because the basic foundations of morality are based on gut feeling, just know that the exact same argument applies to math.

http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf

Math isn't real either and all things are relative. It still works pretty damn well though, to such an extent that I think it's fair to call it real (if abstract) but I don't really care what you call it. It works and we *should* use it.

Oh boy.

should should should

It is useful.

It makes sense.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

@discordian#3213 Math is fucking dum an sheit

[Aristotelian screeching]

ololol I mean it's just arguing over word definitions at some point

But I used math to demonstrate that nothing is free of gut feeling.

Math *and* logic btw.

Of course. Humans have feelings. This you can have.

You can't call me out for logical fallacies without resorting to a system of logic built upon axioms based on gut feelings.

@discordian#3213 If I print out a math equation in a 3D printer, does that make math real?

Only if that equation is five pounds of flax.

The "can math into real" is way too advanced for anyone here imho

Easily one of the hardest philosophical questions out there

You think?

Yup

It's the ultimate underlying fabric. Shrug.

I've read a small bit of it, and my brain hurt '~'

It's not.

Lol jk the ultimate underlying fabric is morality.

You don't know the ultimate underlying fabric.

Fabric is a spook.

Lol jk the ultimate underlying fabric transcends math, morality, and even itself.

This has been fun.

Thanks discordian.

My pleasure, and thanks for the bantz.

I'm going back to see what the Moon Man kids are up to.

Take me with you.

Notes are on point

If you dare.

They vet like a motherfucker in there. They're not likely to let you in tbh.

I'm rather tolerant compared to the rest of them.

What's the server called?