But there hasn't been a stormnigger invasion since many many years ago

And even then we're talking like 2011

No their population has remained consistent. They still make up about a fourth or 3rd of the board

>fourth or 3rd

Lol newfag

Did someone show you the pasta from 2013 where the sad JIDF dude blamed all the anti-semitism on Stormfront

I remember that thread too

Getting spammed

No. They have always been there. A lot of libertarians went to bring full nazis

>Stormfront
>Nazis

More like faggots

I regard them pretty much the same. Samr with other white nationalists

Muh huwhite state

Degeneracy is cool as long as we're doing it

Let's racemix with other white skinned peoples based magapede!

I asked my natsi friend and member of Nordic Resistance Movement about his experience on posting on Stormfront.

"It was shit
Just middle-aged Americans talking about swastika christmas tree decorations"

That and complaining about niggers all day

And that's why every natsoc makes fun of those fags

They're all autists and boomers larping about stupid shit

With no real doctrine and no real drive

Pretend they're representative of the 'movement' when they're not really in any particular movement

Most likely receive welfare themselves

Oh yeah the NEETs are fucking awful

They complain about lazy niggers and then talk about the NEET lifestyle and blame women on various things.

It's pretty hilarious

Then they say that the white race is dying. When it's only the fact that women don't them.

Want*

99+% of people who are involved with serious discussion on politics on the internet are LARPers though. Even people who are apart of Parties and Groups and are 'activists' are LARPers, because their theory sucks and I think it is even worse because they live in a fantasy world were nothing they say will ever come to fruition on a large scale.

Pretty much

@Deleted User Describing yourself too you know

I'm an individualist and anarchist, my politic view is not dependent on others or how effectively it describes the future. It is the most cynical view I know of. It is consciously cynical, and radically so.

Sounds 2edgy

But sure. I wouldn't know this if this too did not also effect me.

@Deleted User
>anarchy

Lol I kid

Yes, that's what I said. But also an individualist kind. Hierarchy, dominance and cruelty in the world might always exist, but I will not be ever be, at least philosophically, under the boot of another. This may all just be a coping mechanism, after experiencing the crushing futility of post-modern politics.

I am not even *that* principled, as to not also be controlled by principals. Like I said, it's radically cynical.

@Deleted User if you stay anarchist chances are you will always remain under the boot of more organized. True anarchy is possible only after communism.

@Firefly#9983 That's food for thought.

@Deleted User So you're an anarcho-individualist, like Stirner?

Yes. But not exactly a Stirnite, but close.