Message from @Dom

Discord ID: 353358103909105665


2017-09-02 01:57:25 UTC  

hitler was a nazi

2017-09-02 01:57:28 UTC  

@Dom >Mussolini

2017-09-02 01:57:30 UTC  

>unironically a nazbol

2017-09-02 01:57:31 UTC  

what?

2017-09-02 01:57:34 UTC  
2017-09-02 01:57:41 UTC  

We got guido in here

2017-09-02 01:58:02 UTC  

What is a nazbol

2017-09-02 01:58:18 UTC  

A meme

2017-09-02 01:58:19 UTC  

elliot

2017-09-02 01:58:21 UTC  

you do know

2017-09-02 01:58:24 UTC  

mussolini's party

2017-09-02 01:58:28 UTC  

came up with the bloody word

2017-09-02 01:58:33 UTC  

russian nazbols are serious nazbols

2017-09-02 01:58:38 UTC  

not the edgy niggers

2017-09-02 01:58:39 UTC  

No they didn't it existed before then

2017-09-02 01:58:43 UTC  

no

2017-09-02 01:58:45 UTC  

the term

2017-09-02 01:58:46 UTC  

comes from them

2017-09-02 01:58:51 UTC  

the theory didnt have the term

2017-09-02 01:58:53 UTC  

Lol russians

2017-09-02 01:58:57 UTC  

and is very loosely connected

2017-09-02 01:59:01 UTC  

Okay buddy, doesn't mean Italy wasn't a half assed mess

2017-09-02 01:59:02 UTC  

couple of english philosophers

2017-09-02 01:59:04 UTC  

cant remember their name

2017-09-02 01:59:06 UTC  

I'd hardly call it fascist

2017-09-02 01:59:09 UTC  

It was a damn monarchy

2017-09-02 01:59:11 UTC  

Mussolinis party was hardcore dude, like anyone who didn't help him rise to power wasn't allowed spaghetti, why do you think the Italians switch side so fast

2017-09-02 01:59:12 UTC  

because it didnt work?

2017-09-02 01:59:18 UTC  

>fascism
>didnt work

2017-09-02 01:59:22 UTC  

I can't blame them for believing in edgy ideologies considering they live in a shitty country.

2017-09-02 01:59:22 UTC  

hold on there buddy

2017-09-02 01:59:23 UTC  

@Dom No because they didn't implement it

2017-09-02 01:59:30 UTC  

okay

2017-09-02 01:59:34 UTC  

no true scotsman.jpg

2017-09-02 01:59:36 UTC  

you're an idiot

2017-09-02 01:59:43 UTC  

anyone who names themself after an incel terrorist

2017-09-02 01:59:47 UTC  

almost deffo an idiot

2017-09-02 01:59:52 UTC  

@Deleted User If the basis of faith is tradition, then it is a temporary thing. According to pragmatism, the non-rational will increasingly fall away. Man may not be ready for it, yet, but if we ought to be as effective as possible, it can be predicted that faith will fall away, just like irrational traditions will. This is just the optimised scenario. One cannot put too much weight on tradition over other things, especially when it inevitablly holds back future success.

2017-09-02 01:59:57 UTC  

@Dom Wow assumptions assumptions

2017-09-02 02:00:02 UTC  

Ad hominems all the way round

2017-09-02 02:00:05 UTC  

what assumptions?