Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 357118984333819904
libtard commie
I am actually a kind of Anarchist.
oh god
you're even more retarded
Why would you say that, comrade?
Who wants to "seize the means of production" with me then stand in the breadline together?
I'll be the guy behind the guy who gets the last loaf of bread
Read it and weep, fascists.
lol that's so arbitrary though
aye, because that totally won't pave the way for a fascistic overthrow of the planet or anything
Anarcho-fascism would take effect you realize that? In a world of pure anarchy you'd notice localized cohesive groups which would foster strong communities
Exactly @TheSny
The best thing the communists could do for us would be to cause massive disorder
'oh hey, would you look at that, the entire planet lacks any cohesive or tangible military force to stop us from overthrowing every bit of land on the map! let's go make a military!'
@TheSny but like... the people mannnnnn
No more nations or borders mannnnn
aye, that's one thing i've never got about this specific strain of autism
The anarchist critique of ideology dates from the work of Max Stirner, though he did not use the term himself to describe his critique. Ideology is the means by which alienation, domination and exploitation are all rationalized and justified through the deformation of human thought and communication. All ideology in essence involves the substitution of alien (or incomplete) concepts or images for human subjectivity. Ideologies are systems of false consciousness in which people no longer see themselves directly as subjects in their relation to their world. Instead they conceive of themselves in some manner as subordinate to one type or another of abstract entity or entities which are mistaken as the real subjects or actors in their world.
all it needs to crumble is a few people saying no
so it's either got to be a totalitarian dictatorship of superpolice at the top with everyone at the bottom
You just made it crumble.
or a self-ending classless society
@Deleted User see I disagree. In national socialism there's not really much abstract to rely on
We relay on the natural world, natural trends, natural hierarchy etc...
like it or not, humans are naturally heirarchical
if you remove heirarchies that effectively maintain themselves and suprpess less beneficial heirarchies, then all you need is a group of people to form a heirarchy and then they overthrow everything
Here's an example of someone who would throw a major wrench in a global communistic society. However in a fascist society he may cause issues but will either be dealt with accordingly and quickly OR he would be isolated from the fascistic/natsoc community entirely
aye, no matter how shit at it's job a government is, it needs it's people well and satisfied in order to maintain itself
removing a government just creates a power vac that'll be filled by whoever happens to arrive next
I'm pro-Anarchy.
Nothing 'special'.
without the support of the people a government falls, without a government to defend the rights of it's citizens the people fall
I totally want that.
National Socialism is the one true governance
mhm
agreed
And it could apply to other cultures as well, it's not some ebil "white supreeeeeemist" thing