*God had to transform into something that could degrade and eventually be eliminated, namely into an array of quarks, protons, galaxies, and other physical forms.*

Otherwise this line of thinking leans too much towards the personalization of a god, so to say a Zeus or odin above us, which imo is a very narrow outlook

Wait

Now this is getting interesting

>arguing about something that doesn't exist

imma fap to that

@Cotton Read the blog post I linked if you're interested. I need to digest this.

Let's go one by one

dam

thomas da auschwitz engine going rogue

So god literally transformed into reality while ending his divine structure with all the omni- titles that come along with it

nope

bulls must be jealous of you, so much shit coming out of your mouth

Why don't you learn to spell philosophy first Thomas my dank babe

**tips fedora**

let me quote richard dawkins]

Pretty much.

"we are born ill and commanded to be well"

"god is like a divine north korea"

God was Absolute in the Deist sense, then transformed into something that would decay. The universe is God's corpse.

and my dick is the source of all dark matter in the universe

Does this process necessarily ends his sentience, do you think? @Deleted User

*God’s plan to suicide himself could not work, though, as long as He existed as a unified entity outside of space-time and matter. Seeking to nullify His oneness so that He could be delivered into nothingness, he shattered Himself—Big Bang-like—into the time-bound fragments of the universe, that is, all those objects and organisms that have been accumulating here and there for billions of years. In Mainländer’s philosophy, “God knew that he could change from a state of super-reality into non-being only through the development of a real world of multiformity.” Employing this strategy, He excluded Himself from being. “God is dead,” wrote Mainländer, “and His death was the life of the world.” Once the great individuation had been initiated, the momentum of its creator’s self-annihilation would continue until everything became exhausted by its own existence, which for human beings meant that the faster they learned that happiness was not as good as they thought it would be, the happier they would be to die out….*

@Cotton Not necessarily, just un-unified his sentience into the 'real world of multiformity'.

no creatonist i have met has put up a good argument

most just shift the burden of proof and claim they won

one of them literally fucking said

"if you can not prove the existence of aliens that means god exists"

You realize this is actually a pretty solid creation argument for a structured pantheistic belief? @Deleted User

🤔

Yes.

here's a "debate" i once had

it starts from the third one

Highly pantheist.

🤔

the faggot was arguing with himself more than with me

More generally though, how does pantheism deal with the 'heat death' problem of the future end of the universe?

pantheism is bullshit

Our reality being due its time, though the observable universe is not the only thing that's within the chaos