Why not both

Nature and nurture

Not "you're either A or B"

Are interdependent

On providing society its own socioeconomic preferences

I agree changing these things depends on the individual, but I don't agree with the bigger hips / breasts concept

Being gay is not nature. It is nurture, except in transexuals

As I am craving for raviolis right now

Nay there is a gay gene

That can be triggered

>gay gene

By one

Instance

So nature and nurture

Plays their respective roles

They both impact an individual

To deny the other takes the extremism of ones identity politics beliefs

And is highly liberal

When you show me a gay gene, I'll be happy to believe you

And gladly claim it's genetic

snow are you gay male ?

Why do you ask

or is that not an appropiate question

wondering if you are talking personally

speaking from personal analization

I'm not but I feel like if I keep treading along my path, I could pretty easily see myself being bisexual

https://youtu.be/MHDCAllQgS0

But I'm not gay, I'm a psychology major

If you want it coming from tge mouth of a biologist

Go on

https://youtu.be/IDmQns78FR8

I studied biology

Or perhaps other theories you'd prefer regarding people being gay

Other than that being gay

Is born out of nurture

Mostky

If the twins are monozygotic twins and you separate them at birth and place them in completely controlled environments and they both turn out gay and you repeat the experiment several times and it's proven correctly, go ahead, you're correct

Nah i just want to refute the idea

That being gay cannot be found in nature

And thats pretty much it

And good night dear sirs or madam