Message from @Nnyef

Discord ID: 368233391847374850


2017-10-13 03:06:17 UTC  

Lemming proles

2017-10-13 03:06:17 UTC  

@Deleted User Reactionaries are literally reacting to a proposed change in the status quo.

2017-10-13 03:06:21 UTC  

Lemming rpoles

2017-10-13 03:06:23 UTC  

Lumpenproletariat*

2017-10-13 03:06:29 UTC  

@Deleted User Lemmings are the issue.

2017-10-13 03:06:29 UTC  

Centrists and fascists in a capitalist nation, for instance.

2017-10-13 03:06:34 UTC  

That's the definition.

2017-10-13 03:06:36 UTC  

@Nnyef Yeah that'd be Marxism

2017-10-13 03:06:46 UTC  

We are in the materialistic stage of general human society

2017-10-13 03:06:54 UTC  

Capitalism is highly materialist

2017-10-13 03:06:59 UTC  

Marxism is EXTREME materialism

2017-10-13 03:07:10 UTC  

In fact Marx chirped a lot about his precious materialistic dialectic

2017-10-13 03:07:15 UTC  

And historical materialism

2017-10-13 03:07:18 UTC  

@Deleted User You are arguing in bad faith, I straight up said the opposite of what you deduced.

2017-10-13 03:07:19 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/368233213899964416/unknown.png

2017-10-13 03:07:33 UTC  

I don't give a fuck what politisci fags say

2017-10-13 03:07:36 UTC  

Marxists can't be reactionaries because they are insisting on a new system.

2017-10-13 03:07:48 UTC  

Reactionaries act in preservation of the system.

2017-10-13 03:07:50 UTC  

I go off of what the word is rather than connotation

2017-10-13 03:07:56 UTC  

Maybe I'm just too autistic

2017-10-13 03:08:02 UTC  

At least you're admitting you don't care about what worda mean.

2017-10-13 03:08:12 UTC  

No, I know the connotation

2017-10-13 03:08:27 UTC  

Connotations are nonliteral meanings.

2017-10-13 03:08:27 UTC  

@Nnyef >Using der juden to your advantage
Now that is hypocritical.

2017-10-13 03:08:32 UTC  

I'm giving you literal meanings.

2017-10-13 03:08:39 UTC  

No connotations can be written

2017-10-13 03:08:44 UTC  

Or do you mean literal as actual

2017-10-13 03:09:06 UTC  

Yes, you can contextualize an alternative meaning, but that doesn't mean that you are honoring the literal meaning.

2017-10-13 03:09:09 UTC  

@Deleted User are you hanging in there

2017-10-13 03:09:14 UTC  

Yeah.

2017-10-13 03:09:19 UTC  

Written word is just transcription of what is thought/said anyway why would it matter if it's on paper

2017-10-13 03:09:25 UTC  

@Deleted User from 1 to 10?

2017-10-13 03:09:30 UTC  

5

2017-10-13 03:09:37 UTC  

Who's that lady in your pic? @Deleted User

2017-10-13 03:09:39 UTC  

@Deleted User that's not too good

2017-10-13 03:09:47 UTC  

Maria Orsic.

2017-10-13 03:09:50 UTC  

Now they're both fighting over semantics

2017-10-13 03:09:53 UTC  

@Nnyef Who determines the literal meaning?

2017-10-13 03:09:56 UTC  

Inb4 grammar nazis

2017-10-13 03:10:03 UTC  

I was in another tab.

2017-10-13 03:10:10 UTC  

Google? The tool developed by the people you want to fight?