Message from @sleeping zzz
Discord ID: 370538548715323402
@Deleted User Fucking idiot, it's all cited, go have a look
>muh wikipedia tho stop proving me wrong with direct quotes from Mussolini
i'll give it a watch
@sleeping zzz Oy vey, nice ad-hominen rebuttal right there.
@Deleted User wrong, it was an ad personam
Ad hominem is commonly mixed up with ad personam
Ad hominem is discrediting an argument by linking a character flaw to it
Eg "why should we trust someone who is fat to tell the truth?"
>mussolini was a glorified prime minister
Ad personam is a personal attack
🤔
?
@Gabe yes because the throne oversaw it all
it was impotent
@Deleted User it means a personal attack ie attacking the individual
Now BRB I'll find a better video for you @Gabe
@Gabe watch this as well, it will help you a lot https://youtu.be/BHibZA-Qs78
Lmao
@chill with that shit strasserite?
More nazbol then strasserite
@Deleted User now to help you better understand where you mixed up the "ad hominem" read the lower section
hot take: capitalism is good
😏
Read Perelman New Rhetoric
@sleeping zzz Still don't see anything that relates to a personal attack in the definition.
@Deleted User it literally says it right there
Ad hominem never meant a personal attack, it is misconstrued that way by brainlets
Ad hominem is attacking an argument via attaching it to a perceived character flaw
Not clicking that
Nice doxx link retard
@sleeping zzz That is literally his email name.
Did you read the citation?
I don't think I should trust anybody coming from that website.
Perelman New Rhetoric 1958 Notre Dame 1969 page 111
The problem with brainlets is they won't trust a source even if it validly cites another source
That's the source that is being quoted
And the dictionary definition that I just read from oxford contradicts that.
So which is true?
are you guys really arguing about the definition of logical fallacies
Here's another template if anyone wants it
@Gabe Yes.