Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 371144024171610142
Yeah, and after?
Complete anarchy.
Russian writing, scientific progress as laws existed now from a law giver. With the Christian worldview came progress as well as the end of and Empire.
The only form of unification would be the nomads at the time.
Sure, it took time for Europe to be reborn into a normal state.
Only about 700 years.
Yeah.
That actually doesn't sound as bad as say... Africa.
Which never even have Empires.
Muh malis wuz kangz an sheit
And the constant collapses of China. The long term disunity of Japan
I don't know shit about Mali to give a proper response to that, even though I can tell it's a joke.
Japan took time to unify, but it eventually became a respectable empire.
And that took a long while.
Look at England, Russia, hell even America.
If you want to talk about respectable Empires, those ~~bar America~~ are such.
Imperial Germany, the French Empire.
Although I would argue that Empires are overall bad.
That potato enjoyed the egg
At least in modernity.
*Potato proceeds to, due to the Muslim's sound waves, roll off of the desk and hit the ground. Before cracking open like an egg, with buttered potato now on the floor.*
Same is true for Japan
lmao
Japan was an empire finally in the late 19th centuary and early to mid 20th century, but WW2 happened.
They were sadly stopped.
"Sadly'
"SADLY"
Okey then
?
Do you have a vendetta against the japanese?
I just find it wrong to see Empires as positive when it leads to internationalistic beliefs to be properly maintained or genocide.
Repression or loss of identity of those origianlly in power.
A purely cultural identity, think the Imperial federation.
~~Britian's ideal of how to solve rebellions~~
Do native pacific islanders have any national identity?
I'm talking more so about Korea and China.
The bigger parts of Japan's Empire.
China at the time was merely a bunch of nations competing for their land.
**Sigj**
Communists VS Nationalists VS Japanese colonials