"SADLY"
Okey then
?
Do you have a vendetta against the japanese?
I just find it wrong to see Empires as positive when it leads to internationalistic beliefs to be properly maintained or genocide.
Repression or loss of identity of those origianlly in power.
A purely cultural identity, think the Imperial federation.
~~Britian's ideal of how to solve rebellions~~
Do native pacific islanders have any national identity?
I'm talking more so about Korea and China.
The bigger parts of Japan's Empire.
China at the time was merely a bunch of nations competing for their land.
**Sigj**
Communists VS Nationalists VS Japanese colonials
Okey... So let us talk about this for a moment.
Yes, but this implies that a foreign invasion is justified by civil war.
Do the Chinese not have any identity? Or spiritual right to soverginity?
To blood and soil? Which they so aggressively foguth?
What identity was left after the qing empire was just destroyed and now most of the land was controlled by warlords?
May I add, Japanese imperialism is what led to the rise of Chinese communism.
Chinese communism was present long before.
Being innately Chinese?
It was present.
But the LARGE victory was once the Nationalists were weakened by the Japanese
the Communists, who lost few in comparison
just ended up winning due to the fact of brutal warfare.
That is due to most of the communists being people who dicked around in the jungles.
Their lower losses?
And the lower population.
And the guriella's.
I'm not saying it's cool they lost less really. I'm just explaining *why(
if the Japanese never attempted
the civil war would have likely gone in the other direction
No shit.
But for the better or worse?
Well, I'm just saying.
Although the Communist regime wasn't that bad actually.
Although it's recently began to degenerate in comparison to it's old self.
WHAT
Even if I'd prefer some other state.
Yes, it *wasn't*
