@Dasus Yep.

You don't realize, this isn't about me. This isn't about us.
This is about the people who will later enjoy this.
The internet is forever. ❤

@Dasus Do I care about you screenshotting this? No.

Your failure, recorded in the history of the internet, and thus practically the eternal human memory.

How does it feel?

@Dasus Oh boy, you are really tugging at my heart strings there, I totally feel regretful.

@Deleted User no, you won't screencap this. You've already mentally screencapped this.
You realize this is a conversation, in which I asked a simple position about a subject, you replied with an absurd position, I replied with reasonable arguments as to why you are obviously wrong, and you started a two-long hour crusade to keep replying to me in hopes that you being more stubborn will prove that you were more intelligent.

You don't screencap this. You remember it.
That's worse, since no-one ever looks at screencaps. (I've like TONS.)

@Dasus *MENTAL SCREENCAPPING INTENSIFIES*

@Deleted User do you know that sarcasm is wonderful because the intuitive instinct of the human when lying is to usually speak about the subject they are uncomfortable with, but without the prevalence of sarcasm, people would actually be denying things. Now you just appear like you desperately WANT to seem like sarcastic.
Which is amusing me.

No witty response trying to ignore everything I said while appearing cool?

Oh

Here it comes.

@Dasus Nope, I am just reading he first sentence of every paragraph.

Yes, yes, obviously you are. 😉

So, do you maintain your position that this conversation was never about any debate about any prohibition and its actually not been about anything and started for no reason?

Thanks for picking it up.

Or would you like to answer these arguments I crafted for your level

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus Yep.

See, you're not even trying to make up your own narrative.

You're like a dog on a leash, this is boring.

Like a TAME dog on a leash, not a newly accustoming dog.

Like, you'd only need one of those really thin leathery pink collars?

Geez.

@Dasus Sure is boring.

That is why I am in another conversation.

Its always like this when arguing against the prohibition of drugs, because people intuitively take the position that "drugs are bad = prohibition good".
It might be super hard for you to question your own mind, but imagine that the prohibition actually INCREASES the problems caused by prohibition, so "drug abuse = bad, prohibition = WAY WORSE"

>That ego stroking

@Deleted User sure, sure, but you still keep switching to this one, in which you keep replying with absolutely empty replies, because you're an intellectually pretentious asshole who's ego is too large to admit defeat in an honest debate on an anonymous server?

Did you end the other debate like this?

"like this"? Like what? Like me trying to present simple arguments for two hours in a row to a person who literally admits to not reading my messages yet maintains to "debate" me ?

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

What's the argument here

I think you should be able to discern it by glancing at log. I've stated it several times.

@Deleted User Literally nothing.

Something about prohibition

Wouldn't be an issue if people enforcing a restriction put maximum efforts into it.

@Dasus argues prohibition hasn't worked and is impossible to work

@Deleted User has absolutely nothing

Like if say you ban a Mexican product and you jail people for using

What does that do about the dealers

Or the growers