Kek, sure.

I thought this was a political discussion server, not a Maroon 5 concert.
(And yes, I had to use google, since I had no idea what is currently popular music.)

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus I guess you were wrong.

Oh in that your ego keeps you from admitting that you've been acting a fool all this time and you'll make a painful memory and the more you stretch it out the better it is for me.

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

Would you like me to relink all the several peer-reviewed studies on the effects of drug policy reform, or would you like to admit you are wrong in defending the prohibition?

@Dasus Nah, I am just talking to more than one person at once.

@Deleted User and that makes those arguments invalid how?

Answer: they don't.

Why do you feel like pretending to be smart is such an important thing?
I mean, I get the need, you might be young.
I used to be young, and I'd debate people and be cocky about it.
But damn it, I'd DEBATE them. I'd DEBATE the subject, and IF I was outwitted, I'd admit defeat, because admitting defat and realizing your own mistakes is the fastest way to self-improvement which is, at least for me, a goal in life.

@Dasus I am just going to go ahead and discard that.

You can keep up this thing, but you need to find some essence in your argument, even if you are holding your position out of pure egoistic arrogance.
Otherwise you'll just appear like a clown.
If not, you need to shut the fuck and live to fight another day.

@Deleted User oh the way you've discarded all the arguments, evidence, links, and the hours and hours of simple arguments I've made about this subject, and in the way you said you ignore most of the things I say?

You see, saying things like that just makes my work easier.

@Dasus Yep.

You don't realize, this isn't about me. This isn't about us.
This is about the people who will later enjoy this.
The internet is forever. ❤

@Dasus Do I care about you screenshotting this? No.

Your failure, recorded in the history of the internet, and thus practically the eternal human memory.

How does it feel?

@Dasus Oh boy, you are really tugging at my heart strings there, I totally feel regretful.

@Deleted User no, you won't screencap this. You've already mentally screencapped this.
You realize this is a conversation, in which I asked a simple position about a subject, you replied with an absurd position, I replied with reasonable arguments as to why you are obviously wrong, and you started a two-long hour crusade to keep replying to me in hopes that you being more stubborn will prove that you were more intelligent.

You don't screencap this. You remember it.
That's worse, since no-one ever looks at screencaps. (I've like TONS.)

@Dasus *MENTAL SCREENCAPPING INTENSIFIES*

@Deleted User do you know that sarcasm is wonderful because the intuitive instinct of the human when lying is to usually speak about the subject they are uncomfortable with, but without the prevalence of sarcasm, people would actually be denying things. Now you just appear like you desperately WANT to seem like sarcastic.
Which is amusing me.

No witty response trying to ignore everything I said while appearing cool?

Oh

Here it comes.

@Dasus Nope, I am just reading he first sentence of every paragraph.

Yes, yes, obviously you are. 😉

So, do you maintain your position that this conversation was never about any debate about any prohibition and its actually not been about anything and started for no reason?

Thanks for picking it up.

Or would you like to answer these arguments I crafted for your level

1) Prohibition hasn't achieved its goal after a century
2) To achieve it you'd need 24/7 surveillance

@Dasus Yep.

See, you're not even trying to make up your own narrative.

You're like a dog on a leash, this is boring.

Like a TAME dog on a leash, not a newly accustoming dog.

Like, you'd only need one of those really thin leathery pink collars?

Geez.

@Dasus Sure is boring.

That is why I am in another conversation.

Its always like this when arguing against the prohibition of drugs, because people intuitively take the position that "drugs are bad = prohibition good".
It might be super hard for you to question your own mind, but imagine that the prohibition actually INCREASES the problems caused by prohibition, so "drug abuse = bad, prohibition = WAY WORSE"

>That ego stroking

@Deleted User sure, sure, but you still keep switching to this one, in which you keep replying with absolutely empty replies, because you're an intellectually pretentious asshole who's ego is too large to admit defeat in an honest debate on an anonymous server?

Did you end the other debate like this?