@Cotton I would recommend you set cotton on fire and call it God.

Ghazali's argument is very close to my ontological belief actually

Can we talk about that?

I think Ghazali was grasping at a ghost.

May I learn your standing on the issue, are you a nihilist by any chance?

Or rather, once a devout catholic, then a nihilist and then a variant of deist?

You know too well of the one who posed as a pianist. But they have returned.

I figured so much

And I'm really happy about it

I am really glad you are still here also.

May I learn the reason for aforementioned Pianist's departure?

@Firefly Do crackwhores like to stick around antifa zones?

Moving to different ideological area did not favour such a background.

And the pianist somehow resented time spent there as a reflection of his new anarchist theories.

Ah, I would love to hear about the process of that ideological development, how it got shaped and derived

I was thinking the Pianist ascended and merged with the "One" for quite a while actually

It is not complicated. Post-Leftism happened. Then there was exploration into praxis lifestylism. Then there was realising that such theory was critique only. Then there was return back to here (at least) based on lack of application.

But with new insight.

Just for clarification, does this process include adopting any part of Stirner's ideas, by any chance?

Haha, yes, the forehead man was involved.

@Cotton Stirner was a faggot who only edgelords and idiots look up to now.

@Deleted User very narrow for someone with the pfp of Ataturk. Change your avatar immediately.

Do not engage.

Not really, my take on the situation is similar to Rick&Morty

Only for fun.

@Cotton Wait what?

I believe it has some value, although it is inherently undermined by the passion of autists and the subculture created by them around the internet.

It is still interest that the mention of the Egoist One rallies such a strong reaction.

From where do you know him Commie? @Cotton

@Deleted User We used to have an egoist here, then he left, he was a pretty big faggot who had no idea what he was talking about 90% of the time, but he was interesting nonetheless.

Everyone who has some minimum interest in history knows about the great Ataturk @Deleted User

And you think too that he supported Communism?

If they don't, they are blatantly ignorant and just kidding themselves

No, I do not

Though he was an exceptional revolutionary, considering his attempts of removing the Sunni Islam cancer from once a great nation

Stirner was a Young Hegelian just like Marx. It is a worthy read.

Why do you support Jews like Marx if you say that you're a Revolutionary Communist? @Deleted User