And he's going on a tirade about Hitler and governments.
You an anarchist or some shit?

A bunch of people died for a bunch of reasons, and shit was corrupt out the ass, but in no way does communism specify the targeting of anyone or anything that doesn't build fascism, or exploit.

And you should read what I wrote :l

Seeing as how it qualified and gave context to whatever you meant to prove about "A lot of people dying"

Yeah I read what you said. You sound like a stereotypical anarchist.

A lot of people die under liberalism and capitalist markets, but I don't supposed we should start counting up a death toll huh

Cause it's retarded, it's WHY people die that matters.

What are you? Commie? Fash? Lolbertarian?

Berniecrat?

No idea just yet, been flirting with the communism bit seeing as how everything else seems to suck ass.

But I did lol at "Lolbertarian"

Gonna use that one

Yeah, don't bother with communism. Communism is fucking retarded. It bases its core idea in that everyone is an identical cog that can be swapped out for another at any time in a state-owned machine.

Either that or they believe anarchism works and that "class" can be eradicated even though the most primitive human tribes have a chiefdom, a leader.

Plus they have bad aesthetics.

Thsts not what it's based in, at all lol.

It's how it treats people. I've talked to enough commies to figure that out

They won't tell you it outright.

Well excuse me if I'm skeptical

Cause if they don't tell you right out,

Its probably cause it isn't a thing.

Its not like they have anything to hide.

It's because they don't realise that themselves

This whole utopian idea of "let's all share and be friends" doesn't work.

Communism in no way specifies the trampling of any "individuality" of the proletariat, there is no "machine" to be a cog in for the majority of the ideology

Unless you advocate for a very specific socialism in one state concept

Its not even about sharing and being friends

It hinges on the greed of the prole

That they, being the suffering disillusioned majority deserve better and had better seize that conception of better

Not for other people, but for themselves.

Do you believe that "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is a good idea?

@Cam He probably does if he is a communist

Explain why.

Its why they confederate, not because oh help everyone else, but because they realize it's the easiest way to help themselves

Its why humanity socializes in general

Both LOAVE and Asa if he thinks the idea is a good one.

And getting back to your chiefdom bit, those arise out of the "legitimized" use of force

Not simply evolving through conversation at random through evolution

There are plenty of societies of literal equals

People who simply "exist"

Entirely horizontal in power structure