What that means is no, You don't literally have to abolish money, just not yet

But just because no money exists doesn't mean people don't work

There is no "human nature" argument to be had there

*just not yet*
Still gonna lead to huge job loss and the abolition of an entire industry, then?

No?

You're operating within a capitalist market, then sure,

But the idea is to abolish the market as the means of distribution

Would Labour unions prevent It?

People wouldn't just stop working

Labour unions prevent what?

Job losses

If you entire argument for the refutation of anything less than capitalism is _the finance market_

Well, they'd probably try and prevent the entire finance industry being abolished, yes.

See

Syndicalism works

For Wall Street in this instance, yes.

Then idk what to tell toy

Wow

That last message

Didnt send

Abolish the American jewry?

I like the idea

If your entire argument against anything short of capitalism

Is the loss of finance as an industry

As if the majority of the human experience is backed through the endeavors of a finance industry

I like capitalism. Money and food are desirable to me, I dunno what to say.

As if that's how either you or I pay your bills or survive

The idea of capitalism is not the bad thing

Then there isn't much to say other than you value the lives of a relatively small number of people

The bad thing is the people using the system

At the expensive of a global population

Because seriously

Its fucking finance

I put my own nation first. I'm not a humanist.

Life is not fair bud

And your nation apparently is entirely the industry of finance ye?

Good shit

Well, actually... London and New York are pretty much battling for "finance capital of the world" at the moment.

I'd sacrifice some third world country to ensure koreas economical growth

And London and New York

As would I to ensure Britain's