Message from @Sn0w ❄
Discord ID: 374423352670027777
>An infidel can never fight along side a Muslim. Christians and Jews have some level of awareness of God, unlike an infidel who directly believes against the existence of God. An infidel's beliefs and views stem from an opposing source of Muslims' beliefs, unlike true Christians' and Jews
@Sn0w ❄ here we go. How to cure this? What if infidel is good and Christian is evil?
@Firefly Well it differs from person to person. Some people, like that guy, believe that infidels are inherently bad. They won't attack a person for being an infidel but they surely won't trust them, even if it's against a mutual enemy. I personally share beliefs with the first two guys
But one way or another, Muslims are supposed to avoid wars as much as possible and are only allowed to go to war if it's for self-defence
@Sn0w ❄ what if Atheist country will propose to support uniting all Muslims in a big Muslim Empire, will Muslim fight for this against Christian?
@Firefly Hmmm.. you mean like if the infidels proposed that they'll give the Muslims a large, private empire if they fight for the infidels against the Christians?
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُوا دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُوا شِيَعا ً لَسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ ۚ إِنَّمَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِلَى اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُمْ بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ
@Mk هالايه لا يتكلم عن الشيعين. تره اهل الشيعه ظهروا بعد القران، مب نفس الوقت. الكلمه "شيعا" هني يتكلم عن الافراق كلهم، يا يكون سني او ايباضي او شيعي او وهابي، ولايهمك، افراق افراق
ودحين اقول ان شاء الله تفهمني ولاضيعت وقتي ههههههه
صباح الخير
@Firefly They wouldn't fight against anyone, especially christians, unless it was for self-defence. If you can think of a senario where all Christians turn against the Muslims that can lead to the formation of a Muslim empire, then perhaps. But even in Muhammad's time, there were Christians living in the middle east and he ordered them to be protected by the Muslims
ممكن تفهمني الفرق بين السنة والشيعة؟
بعرف السنة كويس
انت سني؟
أيه
إنتا؟
ايه انا سني
مب شيعي. لكن صراحتا اقول نهايت اليوم الفرق مش كبيره بينهم. الشيعه م يهتمون باحاديث سيدناا محمد. هذا اكبر فرق
لكن يعبدون نفس الرب ويصلون ويصومون ويحجون، يعطون الزكات وخلاص. هذا اهم شي
الله يدخلهم الجنه ان شاء الله
مدري ليه كل فرق كاره الثاني
يعني الفرق بسيط
بشكل عام، ايه. اما بالتفاصيل، لا
مثلا الوشم حرام معنا ومش حرام معهم
هم يسوون العاشوره واحنا م نعمله
الافراق فالتفاصيل. فالاحاديث.
Terrorists
All of u
y3ne I don't want to say something offensive
I say refugees should stay in the middle east for a few reasons. For starters, they created the problem and so they should deal with it. They can't run away and expect Westerns to come and fix it for them. (Unless you believe that the Jews are the ones who started it because in that case, it complicates it). As for the women and kids as you stated, they should be accepted into surrounding Arab countries (like KSA, Oman, Kuwait, and the rest of the Khaleej) because it will preserve their ethnicity and traditions without disrupting existing traditions and so on (mostly a right wing argument). Since it is an Islam-stemmed issue, then keeping the issue within the middle east hits closer to home than dragging the issue into Europe
اعتذرلك اذا قلت شي غلط. هذي بس رايتي @su
In my book EU and USA going to every country in Middle East and destroying it.
All refugees must be welcome to EU
If America is going to every country there and destroying, then America should be ready to accept all the refugees, not Europe.
And no, not the women and children. What I was saying is that the men, they should stay in the wartorn places in the middle east and fight their problem (if they're really the ones that created the problem)
@Firefly I highly doubt that they created the problems. But then don't you think that they should go to the country that created the problem and not be displaced into Europe?
Arabs have very low IQ
they're only a bit better then Africa