Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 577085008280420373


2019-05-12 10:41:45 UTC  

oke that first one is just a history of termonology

2019-05-12 10:42:02 UTC  

doesnt really supports your point in a single way, not even if you would strech it

2019-05-12 10:42:10 UTC  

its like 100% not saying anything

2019-05-12 10:43:07 UTC  

and the second one is supporting my point 😄 so saved

2019-05-12 10:43:09 UTC  

Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two conceptions can be compatible.

2019-05-12 10:43:18 UTC  

i fully agree with this

2019-05-12 10:43:35 UTC  

the termonology is pretty screw, race biological groupig is fact

2019-05-12 10:44:03 UTC  

im literally talking about this 10 mins ago in international

2019-05-12 10:44:21 UTC  

seems like you are posting links with out reading or understing them

2019-05-12 10:44:40 UTC  

its funny when ppl are so dogmatic they think that anything on the subkect will prove their believes

2019-05-12 10:45:27 UTC  

to then support my point 😄 😄 its how i got this reverence https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BMXVZzvLXz8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

2019-05-12 10:45:53 UTC  

lol

2019-05-12 10:45:54 UTC  

dude

2019-05-12 10:46:00 UTC  

are you even in this reality

2019-05-12 10:46:12 UTC  

your second links upports what i said

2019-05-12 10:47:01 UTC  

haha thos last links require login

2019-05-12 10:47:24 UTC  

you have some learing to do when it comes to supporting your opinons with source

2019-05-12 10:48:45 UTC  

you are not supposed to prove the othes arguments, i would because i have intergerty. but you still think you are right despite posting infrmation that shows that im right . i love ppl doing this :D, i is sad tho that you are this dogmatic and stupid

2019-05-12 10:49:23 UTC  

lol

2019-05-12 10:49:36 UTC  

A those are sources as they are research revrences

2019-05-12 10:49:47 UTC  

B that wasnt something i was arguing for

2019-05-12 10:50:00 UTC  

lol he flips subject again as he got btfu

2019-05-12 10:50:25 UTC  

I said "i got that link from some one posting a link thinking it would support what he beleieved"

2019-05-12 10:51:09 UTC  

let the sperg flood begin as we cant argue with him

2019-05-12 10:51:15 UTC  

lets drow him out tactic

2019-05-12 10:51:20 UTC  

by now

2019-05-12 10:51:34 UTC  

<@217467080847392768> you havent said anything

2019-05-12 10:51:37 UTC  

make a argument

2019-05-12 10:51:51 UTC  

ow yeah whites bad

2019-05-12 10:52:09 UTC  

wait i have something for this

2019-05-12 10:52:22 UTC  

<@227260238774927370> implying im white

2019-05-12 10:52:26 UTC  

fuck you are dumb

2019-05-12 10:52:35 UTC  

ppl already know where im from

2019-05-12 10:53:46 UTC  

edgy kids talking about genocide

2019-05-12 10:54:05 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/360983468286410764/577086089341435914/Africa.png

2019-05-12 10:54:14 UTC  

<@217467080847392768> you should be gassed

2019-05-12 10:54:19 UTC  

but i said eugenics

2019-05-12 10:54:22 UTC  

not genocide

2019-05-12 10:54:28 UTC  

big dif

2019-05-12 10:54:38 UTC  

see

2019-05-12 10:54:46 UTC  

you are having mental health isseus