so why do you state you are eating in reply to that first line after the image

it doesnt makes sense,

unless it was your second line and the first was just more slander and ad hominem

as you havenO aRGUMENT

gENDER

gender

he flips subkect again

lol

well it isnt even loading

and i 100% bet they make the claim, "because of genetic drift and massive varriance you cant really say that x person is x race

oke that first one is just a history of termonology

doesnt really supports your point in a single way, not even if you would strech it

its like 100% not saying anything

and the second one is supporting my point 😄 so saved

Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two conceptions can be compatible.

i fully agree with this

the termonology is pretty screw, race biological groupig is fact

im literally talking about this 10 mins ago in international

seems like you are posting links with out reading or understing them

its funny when ppl are so dogmatic they think that anything on the subkect will prove their believes

to then support my point 😄 😄 its how i got this reverence https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BMXVZzvLXz8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

lol

dude

are you even in this reality

your second links upports what i said

haha thos last links require login

you have some learing to do when it comes to supporting your opinons with source

you are not supposed to prove the othes arguments, i would because i have intergerty. but you still think you are right despite posting infrmation that shows that im right . i love ppl doing this :D, i is sad tho that you are this dogmatic and stupid

lol

A those are sources as they are research revrences

B that wasnt something i was arguing for

lol he flips subject again as he got btfu

I said "i got that link from some one posting a link thinking it would support what he beleieved"

let the sperg flood begin as we cant argue with him

lets drow him out tactic

by now

<@217467080847392768> you havent said anything

make a argument

ow yeah whites bad

wait i have something for this

<@227260238774927370> implying im white