You're saying self-government isn't government.

"although several authors have defined them more specifically as distinct institutions based on non-hierarchical "

You read that one thig that confirms what you said and instantly stopped reading there l,ao

Did you read "Anarchism's central disagreement with other ideologies is that it holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful."

And do you remeber what a state was

Yes, but it's not saying that about governance and government.

...except you think that those two are the same.

absense of evidence is not evidence itself

And you think that 'government' is hierarchy.

"A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, often a state.In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary"

Yeah yeah it is

>often

And again this is just another big terminological mess which ignores what we're trying to actually argue.

Its funny how you have been wrong for an hour and stil dont want to admit it

You dont know what state means, you dont know what anarcy or government means

😄

Ow now you are accusing me of termonology after you have wrtiten half a booklet spouting every term you ever read and remebeerde

No, I'm in fact saying that I know that we're both talking past each other.

This is not a termonology mess btw. Not for me as i know what the meaing of government state and anarchy is.. It is just you who gets confussed

I want to establish common terms as to what we mean by 'government' and 'state' since it's clear that we use the terms differently.

Yeah you made something up

and you think that anarchist are not anti government

when a gorverment "A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, often a state.In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary"

Which is really anty anaracist

Yet anarchists do seek organisation.

They do recognise that we are not free-floating islands.

and the anarist page states that a state in some cases is a posibility, yet you said that they were against states, but not anti government

Also, you still neglect to comment on the >often

Clearly you are wrong clearly you dont know what you are talking about when you use termonology, which you have don a lot in your pointless onnselniscal rants from before

>state is a possibility

What?

Where did it say that?

But regardless of all of this, you're trying to act all high and mighty, using your supposed knowledge of terminological conventions, when in fact you're ignoring the fact we don't have to hide behind the terminologies here and establish what we mean by 'state', 'government' and so on. I can tell you what I think they mean.

yeah it didnt say that

Oops.

Coked.

colunatairy instituses are a posibility

Anyway, that's your game over. Now *my* game.

No it isnt how is that

i wrote states instead of coluntairy institutes 😄

and you take that as a win 😄 😄