gulags are for rebels
not inferiors
Rebels, yes, including those who want to change your system?
lol what are you trying to lead to with that line
Remember: Communism isn't a state of affairs to be established, but the real movement to abolish the ruling state of affairs.
its so pathetiiic '
You want a state of affairs. Rebels would be inferior too, for they would not accept your Big Brain logic, huh?
you cant remove state
So you admit that Communism, as Marx and Engels knew it, is impossible.
communism has a centralized organization
this is the state
like you dont know words, should we carry on in hebrew?
So you are not in the same tradition as Marx and Engels.
you need centralied organization
this is state
Why do you need it when people can organise themselves without it through free association?
its you again, making the non argument, but marx but engles. with out actaully oproviding a rebut or argument
What do you think that I'm arguing?
"Why do you need it when people can organise themselves without it through free association? "
you mean like anaracish
we been over anarchism
There's two things that I'm arguing here: you're wrong, and you don't belong to the same tradition as Marx and Engels.
and this is what the wiki said
😄
No, cut the anarchism shit, I've been through why people do not need to fight each other in the ways which require a state for that sort of organisation that you're implying is necessary.
No you described what the wiki said on anarachism "Why do you need it when people can organise themselves without it through free association?"
Do you agree that the state must be used as a compromise mechanism?
"There's two things that I'm arguing here: you're wrong, and you don't belong to the same tradition as Marx and Engels."
this is not an argument
How is it not?
Do you know what an argument is?
I see that you have burned out.
inb4 he comes back
Knew it!
La Americana!
again just claiming cvictory
you say that i dont belong to the same tradition
it doesnt even means something
wand you are aruing that i am wrnog
You don't understand nuance, then.
