Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 594283272364883968
Do you agree that the state must be used as a compromise mechanism?
"There's two things that I'm arguing here: you're wrong, and you don't belong to the same tradition as Marx and Engels."
this is not an argument
How is it not?
Do you know what an argument is?
I see that you have burned out.
inb4 he comes back
Knew it!
La Americana!
again just claiming cvictory
you say that i dont belong to the same tradition
it doesnt even means something
wand you are aruing that i am wrnog
You don't understand nuance, then.
When you say 'Communist', that's what people think of.
when you are the one who keeps mixing up termonology
And you're not doing that by not respecting the nuance of the word 'Communist'?
you cant even keep anarcy and communims appart despite the qwikis helping you
In fact, no, I can't. You know why?
Communism is stateless. Anarchy is stateless.
butthey are not as communisst need to submuit
communism is not stateless
you have centralized organization
A Communist is free insofar as no-one else feels entitled to step on their toes for the sake of a political squabble.
wtf
thats a back peddal
csondidering you said "do what ever they want"
No, that's what I said the first damn time.
I have to find the quote, which was from around the part that you screencapped!
yeah if you would make some more consise points you wouldnt have such a hard part finding it
i could not say if you said that or not as you wrote so much shit that no one read
And if you didn't keep going round in circles, ignoring my points, it would be easier too.
But you say a communist is free because no one feels entitled to ste p on some one toes. how ever you said force should be used to force ppl so communism can be
For an interim period, yes.
so ppl are affraid to step on poilyical tooes as there are sanctions against it
Why do you think political compromises are made in the first place?
which we also see in history
Yes, but history *prior* to today and today.