Read the definition I gave you.
there is no comprimise
history of communism also show and support the no comprimise thing
'The collective will allow you to live while you support the collective. If not, we lose you, but you lose your life.'
"the definition you gave me"
A deal.
as if you are the autority
Oh, and *you* were with everything else?
When Wikipedia said something you didn't agree with, you made shit up.
You extrapolated when it fell silent.
'muh absence'
and you imply that i dont know what comprimise is whan i point out several points wheer communism doesnt comprimises. WIth points you mentioned yourself
Again, Mr Nuance, that's a compromise.
It's a deal, even if it's a highly unfair one.
"When Wikipedia said something you didn't agree with, you made shit up."
i never disagreed with wiki
you imply and slander
Yes you did. 'muh anarchists don't like governance and governments'
...when it said nothing about governments on the 'anarchism' page.
Yeah absense of evidence is not confirmation
Wrong. On the government page, it said that it's 'often' a state, not always.
Whoops.
we talked exstenivly on how anarcist dont want government , you said they were not anti government
So you're going against what Wikipedia says.
Round and round we go, the amnesiac wants to tire his opponents to submission. How Jewish.
i never disagreed with wiiki, you said, the anarcy doesnt explicitly informs that anarcisy are not not anti government
You did. You said that states and governments are the same when it said 'often the same', not 'always the same'.
They are mostly the same yes
You said always.
and we went truie the differences
which you forgot despite doing it twice
i said always?
thats vague
>they are the same picture
anarchist dont want government
this is take 4 with you , you are looping again
yeah
Because you're also looping, American.
It's what Americans do.
they are pretty much the same a government is a state but a state is not a government per se
and you claimed that anarchist are not anti government
