It means that there is always more to the world than anything that's captured in our minds (materialism).

We cannot possibly form deterministic laws at the most general level, which relates to how we conduct ourselves and what we should do.

Every attempt to capture our subjectivities fails.

*This includes biological determinism. At best, social trends and movements have only been explained 'biologically' in __hindsight__ and in terms of various 'attitudes' which are projections of how we approach things in our time back onto the past. I am not saying that the past cannot be known, but that it is being approached in the wrong manner.*

It's *these* points which you don't want to engage with, and so far you've spent a lot of time trying to avoid them.

It's all relevant to how you view the world and why you keep dragging things out of my words which I've never said. These points are specifically designed to target your uncritically-held assumptions which I am laying out for you to see.

This is the sort of thing that you will seldom get either here or on both the major /pol/ boards, or even on /leftypol/ and splitter boards from 8/pol/.

It's why you cannot even approach what I'm saying. You are far too impatient; you're not used to this whatsoever. You're a junkie for the same old reactionary propaganda, spouting phrases and familiar images like a cross between a child and a bot.

Cheap shots are what you're used to, but when you are disarmed there, you have nothing to fall back on at an intellectual level. Your only hope of getting away from this is to piss off those who want to show you that you're wrong and then flush this shit out of your memory besides the idea that you've 'won' because you got them to fuck off.

holy shit @Deleted User shut down

Really, dont think so,, "Do you know what a search tool is?"

I already stated that the search function doesnt goes that far back, and you are still using this fallacy. Its theer you said it. @ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ implying you even read any of that text 😄

Oh, really?

@Deleted User **So much for not going back far enough.**

***It looks like it was __you__ who brought up that whopping great straw man so far.***

***Let's make this even longer and ever-more dragged-out, shall we?***

And that's the earliest it goes as far as our waltz is concerned.

***You have not uncovered any fallacies in your latest pathetic response - instead, __I have demonstrated that you are projecting yet again__, and that this is yet another of your attempts to pretend that you can dismiss what I'm saying on an intellectual level and not through your sheer laziness.***

Lol, you are not posting the actaul line you said, in total avoidance. you only post all the **free`s** in a attempt to misdirect , you said the **freedom** to do what ever you want. and in order for the search function to work you need to scrollback to load the old text. You really think you are worth the time when you lie and decive by using free instead of freedom, Besides that you are not even posting your actaul line that started this butthurtness from you. This is just weakness with so much efford 😄

Oh, he changes his line from 'free' to 'freedom'.

***Talk about inconsistency, he is PRECISELY the caricature of the 'Jew' that he brought up.***