>you don't understand me!

what you are not adding the social heirachy term

just adding and digressing again

But if you were a Communist, you'd understand.

my game? what are you slandering about

its your game

ow really i would understand than

You told me that I don't understand your positions because you used terms in an unusual way.

do your nonsensical implications and slander make sense all the sudden if i would be a communist

And again , you dont know my points

**there it is again**

the implications that you make yeah thats never ending

And you don't know mine, hmm?

i dont claim to know yours

you think im not a communist

simply because i say that you are not free as a communist

that is assuming

I know you're not a Communist because your idea of 'freedom' is absolute and frozen.

It's nonexistent.

implying and slander attacking charckter and not having a single argument

So you're just saying something that's obvious to everyone.

>character

attacking spelling

No, I was not attacking your character or your spelling.

*You're assuming that again, lard.*

denail

and forggeting what you have said

The charckter of your spelling

or just plain lying ofcourse

he said or "

I said ">character", which was not intended to be about your spelling.

l2r

Mr Nuance doesn't get me.

how do you nuance with charcter

like thats not relating to a single thing there

you are plainly correcting spelling there

You said I was attacking your character, and you should know that I'd respond to that.

after your slander and non arguments

>projecting this much

lol

You're assuming what I mean as usual.