I am confused because in my book, it means something different.

And you just admit in that screenshot that i am rigt

you do have to submit

you darn well know this

yet go on and on with muh freedom screenshots 😄

so we agreed you have to submit in communism yet you are still avoiding this fact

and this goes allone with name calling and slander

First, *the full screenshot*:

in that screenshot you litteraly say that you do have to submit

Second, of course we agree that your idea of 'submission' is unavoidable. I'm saying that it's meaningless for that reason.

and now in text

so why are you still talking

im right

you dioo have to submit in communism

'Submit'

Do you know why you're still not a Communist?

when you submit you are not " free to do what you want"

>he still thinks I said this, even though nothing shows up in the search results

Again you imply and assume because i critise

Okay bud.

Here's why you're not a Communist:

Anything more interesting to discuss?

It doesnt shows up in the results as its way back theer , this denail of you started somehwer just go to the source

>way back there

<:svt:312032528129327106>

Doesn't matter. It would've got picked up.

Garbage is what?

then why dont you post that line

Politicaly?

**You assume that because there is this absolutised submission and a lack of an absolute 'freedom to do whatever you want, that a State is impossible to get rid of.**

@Deleted User

Because that line does not exist.

Then what started this then 😄

What started it is you assuming what I meant by 'submission' and 'freedom' when I never brought them up before you did.

I brought the submission up because you said that communism is free

Slavs resisted kingdomhood for so long

I did not even mention 'free' or 'freedom' before you did.

And then mongol came

Mongol rape

mkay, but wasnt that mostly tribes and such

Is strong