why would i

I'm saying that I can do that and you'd still be wrong because I have a stronger argument.

what argument

You simply say 'no, you argued this' in response.

you are just liek, gioiving your opinon

About what?

Your failure to use my own terms?

yeah right about what , which arguments of yours are strniger then mine

how do they even compare

I agree that your 'freedom' and your 'submission' are not compatible but I was not talking about them.

i simply state that you said that communism is the freedom to do what you want when i disputed that because you have to submit to the colective goal

after which you backpeddal trying to redefine the meing of the word submission

No, I asked you what you meant by 'submission'.

**You know this damn well, it was in the screenshot you took.**

what screenshot

did i even bother to take screenshots

How are you confussed about what submission means

American detected.

You lied again.

slander name calling

I am confused because in my book, it means something different.

And you just admit in that screenshot that i am rigt

you do have to submit

you darn well know this

yet go on and on with muh freedom screenshots 😄

so we agreed you have to submit in communism yet you are still avoiding this fact

and this goes allone with name calling and slander

First, *the full screenshot*:

in that screenshot you litteraly say that you do have to submit

Second, of course we agree that your idea of 'submission' is unavoidable. I'm saying that it's meaningless for that reason.

and now in text

so why are you still talking

im right

you dioo have to submit in communism

'Submit'

Do you know why you're still not a Communist?

when you submit you are not " free to do what you want"

>he still thinks I said this, even though nothing shows up in the search results

Again you imply and assume because i critise

Okay bud.