I didn't say that. I said that things waste away, so even then, that wouldn't work.

fact is that we dont have gene modification that works 100%

Nothing works 100%. What's your point?

fact is that we have differnt ppl having differnt traits that always end up in a class, if this is a function of class or a heirachy. theer will always be class

it works like 0.00000001% of the time

And those 'classes' will be abolished.

>it works so unsuccessfully

Like flying did back in the Stone Age.

Not an argument.

But you cant because of the nature of biological factors that create classes

in ability and specilization

...which can be changed.

No because this is reaility

and in orfder to change it you need to have 100% clones

No, it's the reality that *you want*.

@Deleted User class is not a slavic tradition but a later industry development improvement

and even then you have specilizations which are classes

But they don't have to be set in stone.

class is also a gradient

Marx was clear about this: one day a fisherman, the next a journalist and so on.

I smell Loki's wager.

But just because marx was clear on it doesnt makes it a posibility in reality

in reality you need skill which you gain with expirance

and very few are able to learn differnt tasks

And experience is congealed into memory and capital.

some dont have the ability to easily learn task and new things

Experience is written down, passed down, learned and gained.

mainly because they are low iq

You clearly havent worked a day in your life

Dodging the point.

you dont get muscle memory from reading

There is no point

We are not the same as we were 200 years ago, 5,000 years ago and so on.

>muscle memory

you think you can learn everything from a book and that you are 100% skilled in a thing

which just isnt reality

Unless if it's a fitness strategy

you need to learn things in practice

Why one book?

you cant just reaad a book and be a fisherman

and it takes time to learn a skill