This self-reflexivity is everywhere in logic. Take the liar paradox, for example.

'This sentence is not true.'

It is a paradox, but the movement between not being true and being true with every iteration of thought still exists. It cannot be collapsed into a single moment, though.

In a single moment, the sentence is true or it is not.

Two movements are born: becoming true and becoming false.

Likewise, a subject cannot contain a complete understanding of themselves, since that understanding would explode to infinity.

***It means that subjects must be regarded as processes, forever capturing.***

I can therefore submit to something which relates to my idea of myself - an anonymised or at least pseudonymised entity which represents this idea.

This is what Lacan calls the big Other.

With a capital O.

In Communism, this Other is the thing that we must ruthlessly and consciously hammer into whatever shape is necessary.

The Other represents ideology, or more broadly the network of social relations as it faces every subjectivity.

Every person, every group of people.

Our ideas of ourselves are crafted in relation to our understandings of the world.

and you still think that communsim is doing what ever you fucking want

It's about getting there.

Nice recycled straw man.

you honestly sound like a dictator

A dictator of the self.

that you would force uupon every one else

Not if others can realise it too.

How do you think I realised this?

Through a gun being held to my head?

lol confirm or die ?

It sounds you have issues . like a lot of em

'conform or die' is inescapable as far as you're concerned.

Therefore it's meaningless.

well, you have to eat or you die

so yeah conform

or die

It matters what we conform to.

yoour communsim doesnt gives ppl the choice

There is no choice. Either fight for and with those who want to conform to less things and ruthlessly engineer the world in which we live to mutual ends, or be endlessly cucked and betrayed.

Accept the defeatism regarding defeatisms or live a fantasy made into a fleeting reality.

Really simple.

>to stop being cukcked we need to cuck ourself

But then it's not being cucked, *is it*?

it is

The fool who watches their world get beaten into shape in the name of some god by those who pretend to guarantee them some limited kind of livelihood which the fool thinks that they'll fit into...

...is similar to the person who wants to actively change the world to their ends, mutual ends?

Without any gods to serve?