Yes, but *I* never claimed that they were the same.

**its the meme you misunderstood, we have been over this you cknow 😄 **

So why bring it up?

Even after i explain the meme you stil dont understand

She jokes and claims that they are the same picture

pretending not to see the differnces

So we agreed this entire time that government != state.

Its kinda funny how long you dont understand this meme

No

they are not, i posted the pam meme, "they are the same picture "

because they are not , but they are very simular

>he doesn't know what '!=' means

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_operator#Standard_relational_operators

'!=' is an inequality symbol.

ow im sorry for not knowing that 😄

And I'm sorry for not knowing your maymay. See how this miscommunication works?

is this you being butt hurt about not understanding teh pam meme?

and going on with this for days being so much wrong

that you had to give a come back in which i dindt knew what != meant 😄

Well you got me

i explained the pam thing "they are teh same picture" like 3 days back 😄

and at the moment it self i said they are simular but not the same thihng

yet you spin your wheels so much

making more silly comments

such as you are free to do what you want in communis, whilst you have to choose to submit or we communism will stomp you

Ugh. Here we go again, this is why I made a distinction between two different kinds of political institution and called them 'state' and 'government' respectively.

Regardless of what they are called, you still didn't manage to get me on this point, which is why I'm going to repeat myself *again*.

Not just that the display of ego, in which you are supposedly teh soul and mind of comminsm./ like what diagnoses did they give you. Im nearly asking out of intrest

Yet again: we don't want to kill anyone even for the sake of our principles; we only need to enslave their gods as far as that's concerned. The problem is that the Communist movement is not yet powerful enough to do this, and this has never been true in history leading up to now. There are forces who won't listen to us and fight with us because we don't have the means of demonstrating to them that we can fight for them, and so they will fight us to protect their struggles regardless of how accurately they identify themselves as individuals and their struggles too.

***The point of the abolition of both classes and more generally the politics where exclusive interests fight as exclusive interests rather than as part of a universal movement is that there would be no need for conflicts to be resolved through the death and/or submission of one interest exclusively to another.***

Oke repeat yourself again as you dont have a single connection to this world.

Yes, even though I am right in this world, I somehow have no connection to it.

You are not right, i pointed out your wrongs several times

There is an irony here. You kept talking about 'freedom' as if it's some abstract thing.

and here you make another

if communism is what you say it is, then it would not be communism until you have reached that point of absolute communist force to be communist

and in that in it self communism your communism is oppresive and destructive

Again, you admit that you're dealing with perfections and absolutes - things which can never exist. But Communism does not give a shit about those.

>and in that in it self communism your communism is oppresive and destructive
Says the nazi pretending to be communist

That's why Marx talks about 'the real movement to abolish the present state of things' rather than 'a state of affairs to be established'.