```Lol, i love how you argue that you dont have a big ego, because you say that some one else knows more doesnt means you have no ego. You have sjown your bloated ego already, ever y one knows
```

You said that I thought of myself as 'Communism', but if I say that someone else has more of a right to be called 'Communist' than me, then by my own metrics, I am not as much of a Communist as them.

If I'm saying that I'm dirt next to someone else, then maybe I don't have as big an ego as you previously alleged by saying 'you think you're Communism'.

I am confident in what I say, and you take this confidence as being unwarranted, which is the reason for your assertion that I have a 'big ego'.

You say that you've already proven me to be wrong in various matters, when as has been shown to other people like Firefly and Borzo, you have been utterly outgunned in almost every way.

**Maybe it's *you* who has the unwarranted confidence, and this is what damn near everyone else here seems to know.**

So even your assertion that 'everyone knows' is looking quite shaky.

Anyway, I've dug up even more about your study.

Your study ignores the influences of poverty and of people's relations to production, i.e. *economics and politics*.

It mentions 'heritability', which relates to differences in phenotype due to differences in genotype but does not rule out 'nurture' factors rather than saying 'it's down to genes more than it is to society'.

Case in point:

*And before you scream at me about 'heritability' - here's a source you know and love:*

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability

**It gets even worse for your case. These biological factors are themselves subject to our own practice - i.e. whether we leave them alone or change them in whatever ways, and how we change them. All that stops them from being 'Natural' is our present incompetence at manipulating these things.**

>Garbage mentally suppressed Offender 10/10

Offender knocked out completely

at this point is just humilation

left

He can keep going regardless of how much damage has been done to his case, which is what has been knocked out.

did he try meds?

Those who handicap themselves don't necessarily stop when faced with evidence that they're wrong.

He would simply say 'no u'. I might be trying to argue in good faith - even with all my ad-homs, since I've still made points - but that doesn't mean that anything necessitates him doing that.

There is nothing to stop him from repeating himself with a few changes to his words as if none of what I've said has damaged his case - yes, this is regardless of whether or not his case is kaput.

I hope you're not his doctor:))

Why to care about offender?

He is but an example.

I see

Is like zoology

or zoopshychology

Sort of. People seem to want to reduce themselves to being animals because they cannot put up with the fact that they're not. It means that they have responsibility, of course!

Is funny you're doing it on leftypol

It's funny that I'm doing it on Discord too. This platform is not made for shit like this.

Just few want to have it, surprisingly.

It was made with sophomoric gamers in mind as a target audience.

If I was not limited to 2,000 characters per message and the instant messaging format, my attack would be even more devastating.

What do you know about Anatoly SHarij?

I don't know of that person.

Anatoly Sharij is a Ukrainian investigative journalist, videoblogger and politician. In June 2019 his own political party, "Party of Shariy" was registered in Ukraine. The party intends to take part in the 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary