Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 599204758913548291


2019-07-12 11:41:28 UTC  

And violence requires justifications in people's minds - even if it's just a 'feeling'.

2019-07-12 11:41:39 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/360983468286410764/599203719837515806/not_having_muh_wealth_myth.jpg

2019-07-12 11:42:14 UTC  

Notice how you dodged the claim about biological determinism.

2019-07-12 11:42:51 UTC  

Again, pulling up any number of studies doesn't prove the claim. How is this not related to *social factors which are based upon things like systemic racism*?

2019-07-12 11:43:03 UTC  

", I was very clearly talking about Beaver 2003 " did you even mention this. lmao

2019-07-12 11:43:16 UTC  

did beaver ever even came up here lol

2019-07-12 11:43:16 UTC  

I did, I was talking about that study and quoting from it the whole time.

2019-07-12 11:43:25 UTC  

that study

2019-07-12 11:43:36 UTC  

lolo it is you who brought beaver up and not me as you say

2019-07-12 11:43:40 UTC  

you are so delusional

2019-07-12 11:43:41 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/360983468286410764/599204232167686156/unknown.png

2019-07-12 11:43:46 UTC  

You quoted it.

2019-07-12 11:44:04 UTC  

This was the study that *you* brought up to try and prove biological determinism.

2019-07-12 11:44:29 UTC  

Look at the name leading it: *K.M. Beaver*.

2019-07-12 11:44:41 UTC  

'here is one example', you said.

2019-07-12 11:45:10 UTC  

Youou yourself was queting from the abstarck saying they did account for enviormental effects as they looked at the parrents right

2019-07-12 11:45:14 UTC  

I explained how what it shows can be attributed to *social* factors which are independent of 'muh biology'.

2019-07-12 11:45:18 UTC  

so your argument is false and you are lying

2019-07-12 11:45:27 UTC  

the beaver study did look at the enviromental effects

2019-07-12 11:45:32 UTC  

I didn't say otherwise.

2019-07-12 11:45:47 UTC  

and why if you did agree with weaver dio you use the works of the study ? 😄

2019-07-12 11:45:48 UTC  

I said that it was looking at *racial* effects.

2019-07-12 11:45:53 UTC  

and im the one grasping at straws:D

2019-07-12 11:46:02 UTC  

'the works of the study'?

2019-07-12 11:46:07 UTC  

it looked at genetics

2019-07-12 11:46:14 UTC  

and the maoa gemarker

2019-07-12 11:46:19 UTC  

It didn't *just* look at genetics.

2019-07-12 11:46:21 UTC  

not at race as the cause lmao

2019-07-12 11:46:38 UTC  

they just found that there was a higher rate among negroids

2019-07-12 11:47:09 UTC  

How does this link to your assertion that biological determinism is true?

2019-07-12 11:47:29 UTC  

My focus was not on *race* as a biological taxonomisation.

2019-07-12 11:47:37 UTC  

"I explained how what it shows can be attributed to social factors which are independent of 'muh biology'." lol you first say they did not look at enviormental factors, yet you say this

2019-07-12 11:47:43 UTC  

you are flip flopping so hard

2019-07-12 11:47:51 UTC  

I never said 'they did not look at environmental factors'.

2019-07-12 11:48:09 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/360983468286410764/599205353820913665/unknown.png

2019-07-12 11:48:25 UTC  

This was the screenshot you brought up to say that I said that.

2019-07-12 11:48:28 UTC  

niter is enviormental

2019-07-12 11:48:29 UTC  

lol

2019-07-12 11:48:39 UTC  

nurture *

2019-07-12 11:48:54 UTC  

And yet we can change the environment too.

2019-07-12 11:49:08 UTC  

So no, biological determinism is not proven.