Message from @me
Discord ID: 600012817290231817
You strawmanned my position *and* the research itself.
it just programs the immune system
Wrong.
```The CRISPR-Cas9 system works similarly in the lab. Researchers create a small piece of RNA with a short"guide" sequence that attaches (binds) to a specific target sequence of DNA in a genome. The RNA also binds to the Cas9 enzyme. As in bacteria, the modified RNA is used to recognize the DNA sequence, and the Cas9 enzyme cuts the DNA at the targeted location. Although Cas9 is the enzyme that is used most often, other enzymes (for example Cpf1) can also be used. Once the DNA is cut, researchers use the cell's own DNA repair machinery to add or delete pieces of genetic material, or to make changes to the DNA by replacing an existing segment with a customized DNA sequence.
Genome editing is of great interest in the prevention and treatment of human diseases. Currently, most research on genome editing is done to understand diseases using cells and animal models. Scientists are still working to determine whether this approach is safe and effective for use in people. It is being explored in research on a wide variety of diseases, including single-gene disorders such as cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, and sickle cell disease. It also holds promise for the treatment and prevention of more complex diseases, such as cancer, heart disease, mental illness, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.```
Quoting again.
So that is a starmen if you say that this is the proof you can change genetics
Give source pls.
as this is changing the reconizion ability
I want sauce as to how it's just about changing the immune system.
I want some sauce!
>CRISPR-Cas9 is a genome editing tool that is creating a buzz in the science world. It is faster, cheaper and more accurate than previous techniques of editing DNA and has a wide range of potential applications.
Prevention of diese is another strawmen
Nope, that's what the research is saying.
a gene being tarfeted for ellimination is not editing a bgenetic being in the sense that it changes it
they simply eliminate code lines
You do know that genes are *instructions* for the replication of certain biochemical processes?
to prevent disses
the buil up of the brain is set by the genetics
So *of course* the disease does not go away. We would need another prong of attack.
the thing is, the ability to change genetics exists outside of CRISPR. but it's well on to impossible with our current technology. CRISPY is just a way to a short cut that happens to work
the base code the building pllans have already been executed
And biochemical therapies can change the way the brain functions too.
here you are side steping to the dsses ?
changing genetics was never a question. it was always accepted
So if the genes have already 'done their work', they don't matter any more with regards to the therapy.
off course teh disses doesnt goes awat??? whtf are you on about
You tried. And failed.
@Deleted User strokin' out
So 'muh genetic biological potential' goes out the window.
"Nope, that's what the research is saying." it is saying that their research is not a strawmen to your argument
non of this shows you can extend the limits of genetics
simply targeting and eliminating disses genetic markers isnt the same
that that is possible was never questioned
Nope. I said that we need both biochemical therapy and genetic therapy to change the brain structure.
So you lost.
one could obviously reason that you could make negroids less agrassive by attacking the MAOA alle
You said that biochemical therapy was limited by genetic effects, but all of a sudden changing the genes does nothing.
but this wouldnt make them smarter
eleminiating gentics is not the same as changing
So what about the brain structure actually stops biochemical therapies from working?