we would do so with existing markers and gentics

yep

sop it would still be biological determinsm

racist!

neur plastcy is set by the limit of the genetics

you can adjust be plastic

But you just said that the markers don't matter as much because removing and changing them won't do anything to the structure.

but the rubber band snaps of a determinated point if you pull on it

like you are so jew

And no, we would not do so exclusively with existing markers and genetics.

So you failed again.

The limit of genetics can be changed.

you just forget that i just complety disproved your shit and go to the next thing i have already diproven before

i recal some one else doing that

@Deleted User again with the racism; nazi overtones

Nope. I said that we can change both biochemistry and genes.

Hence brain structure.

the limit of genetics can be changed, by using other genetics

still the same thing

egentics set the limit

But if we're setting the genetics, then how can you account for that?

if you change out the genetics in a person with other genetics . it is stil biological detreminism

see how we loop

How can you account for *how* we set the genetics?

well you

The loop is precisely my argument!

pw really

Can you isolate the 'I'm going to change this patient's brain to do this thing' gene?

they have

And can you reduce the social movements which deem this a wise or unwise idea to biology?

they cannot

And since it's necessary for *all human action* to be determined biologically for your argument to work, *your own actions* too?

he's a racist; it's done

anything outside of that is meaningless to him

in his head, it doesn't matter, as long as he gets his way

Again: ***at the moment that you provide proof that you're biologically determined and that your biology is what caused you to act this way, you have already done something new which can't be explained by the application of the biological models that you've used - __you've thought about all of this__.***

you know I have

Your existential crisis is a mask.

his is, yes

Indeed it is @/me#2047

I wonder if he's figured out I kept responding and has gone back to read