eitehr way you say you type with 300 keystrokes a min , yet when i looked over at discord i seen you typing your wall o text. Then went to do stuff. looked at the chat some more, you were stil typing. talked to some ppl , looked again and theer you were stil typing

You dispute that my claims, but they are not my cliams, tehy are facts.

You say we ? who is this we? i notised some one else assuming your gender. And the general butthurt from a couple ppl sounds very simular.

Are you talking about me with your we?

How flattering

Again, you dispute my facts, because you assume neuoplasticity

but then dont rebut me saying that the limit of plasticity depends on a person set of genetics.

"When I respond that we can do that, you then say that we cannot change genetic potential despite the fact that we can change the genes so that the cells won't try to emulate past behaviours and shit like that"

You used the example of changing the ability of the immune system, thinking and using this as a argument that you can change the brainstructure so it increases the potential ist the same, and feesebility is yet to be proven

And i reitterated, even if you are able to patch in genetic material it wont change existing structures as they have already grown. And if you patch it you patch it with another set of genetics, so it is still genetic determinism

I never talked about reductism other then the times you brought it up , You are creating strawmen.

If i am the punching bag, then why are you getting baited so much, also this puching bag keeps giving you knock downs that cause massive amnesia in you

Where did i take such a postion ? i would ask if you imply much, but i already know that awnser 😄

You used me taking kratom as a means of slander, clearly the paragraps of ad hominem assaults on charcter indicates your hypocitism. One side you slander me for taking some alkaloids that have a enhancing effect, the other side you claim you dont hate the use of pscycoactive substances.

i never dodged this, I proclaimed that you were silly in the head to think that past facts are not relevant because of the chenging future. Your argument here is, you dont know what happens in the futuire, so you cant look at the past its facts.

You dodge whole decades long studies with this notion. And again igoring the gathered results of them, because theer are potential infinite studies. In which you "assume" that they would say something completly differnt

Saying theer are infinite studies in the future doesnt disputes facts of to day bud 😄

So yes, you got the idea to start talking about biological reductiobnsm becaus eyou read this on the wiki 😄 like i daid and predicted

Where did i said that it "completly"described everything? Again a assumtion that you build your strawmen on.

As for the other clauses, they are still genetic workings (again you got this from the wiki ) just because you have polygentics that influances other genetics doesnt makes it less determinsim.

The wiki that you got your argument from is simply using teh "we dont know how these biological aspacts work" As biological reduction isnt a thing..

Which is a falacy because that argument rests on biological determinism being effected by more then on alle.

Try to steal argumentation that actauly hold up bruh 😄

loll that backpeddal

wheer did i say that the enviorment is 100% created by biological aspects? Implying again, and you are wrong as i never said that it was soley caused by genetics, is weather caused by genetics? is the shining of teh sun caused by genetics? pls dont be so silly as you m,ake it to easy

The outcome results of some ones biolical nature is indeed seen in hindsight, but does this excludes predisposition? yeah it doesnt.

"You kept saying that biology is the sole cause of human action,"

I never said this

Even more so becauise i know what human actaully means

and if you are following your biology you are not human 😄

You keep using these words and terms you dont know the meaning of

Read samual Johnsons works

If you change the fgense you do this by adding different ones, this is stil biological determinism