you are just "damage controlling" me pointing out that you dont know what you are talking about

here he goes again with the we thing

absolutly delusional

You conveniently dodged this:

and this:
declaring truth to be false doesn't actually change reality

Also, now you're derailing again about 'muh we'.

read the mental health bit

no i just stunned about your ego

that you think you are the collective of workers when you havent worked a day in yourlife

How is this even relevant? Can we do nothing about these illnesses?

Another adhom.

declaring truth to be false doesn't actually change reality

i doubt if medication would work for you bud

Derailing, dodging again.

Adhom.

want to find out?

What am i dodgiong ?

reality

you not understanding state and government

>you think you're this and that

I do. I

'll gladly educate you

i called you out on this and you side tract with " you say you always have to have a state" thing

I don't side with you saying that you always have to have a state at all.

you derailed the end conclusion in which you realised you were the one being rediculles stating **lie** when i said that a state is not a government persee

no. there is one whether we want it or not

I say that *there is no ultimate need for one*.

as you are clearly showing your ignorance

That's not what your lie was.

conclusion not supported by premise

backpeddal

fallacy

You litterly copypasted me saying that a state is not a government persee

and said **lie**

because it's not exactly true

And I was responding to you saying that you didn't say that governments are examples of states.

It isnt a lie

you are trying to slander theer