I don't side with you saying that you always have to have a state at all.

you derailed the end conclusion in which you realised you were the one being rediculles stating **lie** when i said that a state is not a government persee

no. there is one whether we want it or not

I say that *there is no ultimate need for one*.

as you are clearly showing your ignorance

That's not what your lie was.

conclusion not supported by premise

backpeddal

fallacy

You litterly copypasted me saying that a state is not a government persee

and said **lie**

because it's not exactly true

And I was responding to you saying that you didn't say that governments are examples of states.

It isnt a lie

you are trying to slander theer

So you switched the context.

you are attacking the person by calling me a liar

it is 50 shades of grey, senpai

truth supresion methods

I'm attacking your argumentation.

declaring truth to be false doesn't actually change reality

No you are calling me a liar

you are not saying wrong

you are

you are saying lie

"naunace "

you are a liar

Because you backpedalled and lied about what you said before.

now you say that i becakpeddal

So you contradicted yourself.

and you said you have your own claims

implying i am contraditing myslef

you mislead, misdirect, spin, deny, hide, jump away from any attempt at normal discourse

"because i backpedalled and lied about what you said before"

>>implying

and declaring truth to be false doesn't actually change reality

another fallacy, but I love saying it to you

well, not actually

you are to much