Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 605937449532784689
```And how in the world are you implying that i have even a thought of nirvana whilst saying this.
I am been logical and realistic.. Your gods idea is unrealistic . Yet you accuse me of tnirvane fallacy
you are such a jew
```
Go back to Hollywood. ***You're the one inserting your god's-eye-view concepts into your straw man of my points while I've consistently said that such an idea of 'freedom' is impossible and thus not really anything to give a shit about. __It's why I constructed a definition which requires provisionality and historical context.__*** I accuse you of the Nirvana fallacy because your own position is that while saying that all concrete systems cannot include this impossible ideal 'freedom', you pretend that a *concretely-limited* system is what's best. We don't have to be racist and we're not condemned to being so. We don't need a sustained and self-reproducing class society even if we can never get rid of specialisation (class is not reducible to specialisation).
```hes a troll that reads things and uses terms he remebered incorrectly as he doesnt knows what they mean
Nirvana fallacy comparing actaul things with fantasy
```
Even if I'm not using conventional definitions, why do you insist on inserting your own definitions (conventional or not) into everything I say after I warn you not to do so (because you'll end up spouting uncontroversial shit while leaving the real controversies untouched) and I make myself clearer on what I mean? Maybe it's because you'd rather forget the actual points that I'm making and then pretend that you were saying them all along while I backpedalled to agree with even though I'm still claiming that we're not in agreement?
```im liek saying all this factual measurable stuff. ehe talks about stomping ppls god with a fluid state of gnetic biology or some shit
```
You keep missing out what isn't measurable and you pretend that your assumptions regarding what all that data means with regards to creating a political programme are all true. From causality and the actual nature of politics and the social world (against which I launched the 'infinite studies' and split-subject arguments) to the laughable standard of 'corruption' that you've advanced.
```its entertaining in a fucked up way
```
If you know it's fucked up, why are you doing it? Are you being 'corrupted'?
***You got surprise buttsecksed.***
its true you know
So no you all the dudden accept that the self can be corrupted in to having a choice made that isnt theres
intresting backpeddal
\ i post the wiki definitions, so try again bud. It is you who changes up the meaing of things by making something up that fits your narrative
I never said that true freedom coudl be obtained. unless you are god. there are to many limitations to man . you will never be free
I also stated thare is a gradiant of freedom
here again you are arguing against me ion bias and assumtion when in reality you agree with me
funny
Every one is racist
Racism: the recognizing of the inherent differences among the various racial groups
Not every one is racially discrimative , racuially predejudges or racially bigoted. These terms are conjoined and they meansomething differnt when they are appart
And you accuse me not knowing basic things
racial micing is genocide
diveristy is un obtainable if you mix ppl
Are you fucking kidding me btw
animals dont do things because of their biology ??, have you ever heard of the clownfish
a clown fish has a symbiotic relation with the anomene. They developed a biology that changes the properties of its skinby getting stung, resulting in a slimy layer on the fish that allows it to slide past the ?stingers? of the anomone
You can take a clownfish that never seen a anomone in its life and py them togheter
and the fish moves in to have itself get stung
This is biological predeterminated behaviour
parcially it tots is
Are you saying that there isnt always a input, need, disaster, moment, event that is corrupting the freedom of a person.? lol