I am not putting words in your mouth. 😃

you're just repeating things I'd said

Because you said it in a way that made it applicable to both of us.

So I was not incorrect in saying it.

holding a presumption is not the same as being wrong about a definition

Ad hominems are not different no matter where they are used

people however can be different based on location

Got it.

there is only one adhom falacy, there however is innumerable people

every one being different

fallacy fallacy

fallacy fallacy fallacy

implying the fallacy is wrong because it is a fallacy

because that fallacy is a fallacy

😌 when ur bad at shitposting

>when you're a faggot hiding out on a leftycuck discord

🤔

🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔

So you're NOT a lefty?

You're defending lefty concepts on a lefty server, where as I am not

I have Goebbels as my pfp and have repeatedly denied being a communist. If you are still desperately holding on to the "presumption" that I'm a "lefty retard nigger" then you are doing so purely because that is what you wish to believe.

Simply because I disagree with you.

you are defending leftist ideals, with apparent knowledge on such concepts

😌 when ur still bad at shitposting

the average person does not understand or care about communism and how the USSR was filled with kikes

when you dismiss actual discussion as shitposting

What leftist ideals have I defended? Respect for honest fact-collecting and reliable sources? That's not a leftist ideal.

That's just good research.

you dont make yourself look 'intelligent'

What would inspire you to 'research' about leftist positions, on your free time?

sheer coincidence?

being a not-not communist?

The first citation from that graph is from an obscure journalist with no scholarly credentials. The secondary source is reliable, and from a Yale professor, but unfortunately from a book detailing the similarities between Stalin and Hitler's regimes. The 95% statistic comes from the obscure journalist.

playing pretend?

Honestly the Yale citation is just there to make it look legitimate.

The chart is a sham.

That sir is an adhom, you are attacking the journalist based not off his argument, but rather his credentials, which do not define his argument or his intellectual abilities

@carlton™ you are too educated for right-winger, see? Your comrades can't even believe you are one of them ^__^

something being obscured or not does not define it as correct or incorrect, either

Having no credentials and being used a primary citation is grounds for questioning the legitimacy of a statistic that is by a factor of 19 larger than records directly from the Soviet government, no ad hom.

The truth doesn't suddenly vanish when someone says you are not allowed to