Nationalism has no economic policy.

>Nationalism has no economic policy.

This gets funnier

firefly

how fucking tarded are you

You COULD say there's implied economic policies such as protectionaism over free trade, but that's a bit of a stretch.

>implying nationalism is protectionism kek

And nothing as comprehensive as communism/capitalism.

Nationalists typically don't pursue free trade policies.

Is that the reason economy sucks in Ukraine, because nationalists have no economical policy?

And again, it's a bit of a stretch to argue for either of those.

Nationalism does create shitholes, look at 1930

No, the reason Ukraine sucks, for the fifth fucking time, is because the breakup of a larger state into smaller ones naturally upsets the balance between its former internal economy and leaves all of the resulting countries worse off than before.

@Firefly What do you think of a war going on in your country to explain bad economy ?

Germany

You're so far the first one to defend your complete failure as of right-wing.

It wasn't tolerant

so it was a shithole

not like my noble comanche ancestors, who were extremely tolerant

@Gavroche I left Ukraine before war because of the bad economy.

Oh, yes. Commanches were famously tolerant in their genocide of neighboring tribes.

@carlton™ that's racist

Racist of the Commanches, yes.

We natives did nothing wrong

I am merely providing an objective historical view.

>Natives not being completely peaceful

>pointing out historical facts
>"RASCIST!"

>objective

Stop shitposting faggot

You're the racist

@Firefly Where are you now ?

😎 Negative.

@Gavroche San-Francisco

San Francisco. Checkmate.

Hah. You thought using war to explain a bad economy would work? Nice try.

How about the american dream ?

@carlton™ they would be proserous if they were communists like my Comanche ancestors

Shut up shitposter

@carlton™ The market doesn't like wars and volatility

@carlton™ I bet you're not even a communist