Also I don't have to follow Stirner exactly. Stirnerism is for Stirner.

Private property just doesn't *feel* right. It is too uptight. I am just as likely to destroy *my* property as someone elses.

Cool self-portrait.

@Deleted User >He is worried about destroying his and other peoples property
Consequences are a spook.

I am not worried at all. I am just saying that I have no special attachment to this or that objects. 'Property' is all the same, 'property' doesn't exist.

'Property' destruction is fun. Primarily because people attach themselves to it and are frustrated by its removal.

Me? I don't care. Burn it all down. I would have lost nothing.

I want to see that tested.

If you really do not care, then why not burn down your own house?

Two main reasons. I'm neutral about it. It would be an inconvenience.

Consequences are spook

You said yourself that you hate all property, so why would it be an inconvienence to you now if you hate it all?

I didn't say I hate property. I said I don't believe in it. The physical existance of objects is still real.

It takes work to burn things down. I need motivation.

The revolution won't start itself, so go ahead and burn that couch.

Revolution? What revolution? Doesn't seem likely.

What? I thought all of you supposid marxists and anarchists believed in revolution.

Are your ideologies just dreams?

You're implying I give a shit about the success of some revolution. Too much work. I participate when it pleases me.

Hope you like waiting.

Not really. Which is why I don't waste to much mental energy thinking about it.

Those spookie communists can do all the hard work if they want to. That's on them.

Give me pain killers

Patience is a virtue, you are going to have to learn it if you are not actually going to participate in it.

I'm not invested in it though.

(That or you can just knock yourself into a coma, in which case you are going to miss out on a lot and are going to be in deep shit finanically and socially)

@Anglican Go find some alcohol. Never too young to start.

How about **n o**

Commies are all talk. They have no presences in the first world. Why are they not seeding more revolutions in the developing world, if they care so much? Let's laugh at commies.

I have seen a lot of commies from leftypol admit that communism cannot work in todays world without a miracle or divine intervention, so it seems a fair ammount are losing faith in it.

**F a s c i s m**

Yeah, I would too.

But Fascism isn't much better. Maybe even worse in its implausibility.

It's just more ignorant of it.

Though you cannot say defineatly whether or not the system would have worked or not, given that it existed on a large scale within countries for only roughly 40 years, which is astronomically short for just about any belief.

For sure. I'm not about to defend Communism. I am just saying in today's world, at least the Commies can admit their deficiencies. Fascists are less sober about it. They just live in more fantasy.

Now we are just stooping down to bickering.

A little. Do you have a soft spot for fashies?

It seems that your mind is being a bit forgetful about me.

Don't worry, I will just exploit it and not further inform you about our past experiences.