"tribes existing in the modern sense of a nation"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dJolYw8tnk

so called barbarian

hehe

you don't have any such tribes that have that definition

What are you so hinged on "the future of europe" for. We're talking about the vast majority of the human existence

you simply do not

and wasn't Europe for many years considered the entire world?

We're talking about the existence of people with organization, sure,

But a state, no.

be wise to interpretations

well

hey guys

....

hey

time out for a sec

you aren't adding anything to the conversation

You can have organization, and do any number of great things, and not have a state lmao

lets all do a big bong hit and then re convene

Not have a central authority, or atleast one strong enough to justify being equivalent to a monarch or some shit

@Deleted User im a professional troll debate moderator

....

Is it me, or is this discord filled with more and more trolls every day?

no but....

And gg marijuana

you are both wrong

.....

All that dank

@Deleted User wrong @Comrade Skeltal wrong

Lol

you both are dead wrong

what don't you get michael

no

what you dont get

to be a king...

no

= the power of the state in ancient times, and control of all highest of nobles and highest of kin

so wouldnt that mean

Why do you keep trying to pretend I dont get something

the highest of nobles ARE kings?

And no?