But notice how they dont go in and write about bullshit?

And you know that how?

It has all the substance

Bevause I'm not a dunce E, go ahead and try to edit

And then record how long it takes

Cant be assed tbh

That's what I thought.

So you asked for sources, there you are.

Take them for what they are, or don't

We still havent factored in preventable disease and hunger

Hunger will always exist.

@Comrade Skeltal So just a bunch of mods who have to moderate millions of pages? Jesus, it is no wonder why wikipedia has a reputation for being untrustworthym

"It has substance" Is not an argument, it is a statement, at least try.

"A bunch: entirely subjective value placed on their strength of personnel

And,

It has substance, wasnt meant to be an argument, what I said prior was

You claiming it isnt substance, isn't an argument

@Deleted User This is evident, despite all the money we throw away in africa, nothing changes there, the situation has only gotten worse over time.

@Comrade Skeltal How so?

Because we aren't throwing away money there

We're taking money out

In droves

And then sending a portion back in the form of aid and humanitarian effort

That isnt meant to change shit

But keep the economies of the continent open enough to our economic policy and investment

@Comrade Skeltal This is how much we are paying for the governments in africa.

Its been the prevailing order since the 70s

Hmm

Again, A fraction of what we take in

I can source if you want

But then again

You may take issue with...

Anti communist economists?

And that graph legit doesn't have dollar amounts on it

You said " this is what we spend"

And its a shit load of percentages

I believe lack of education to be part of the problem.

How about you use actual papers instead of out of context graphs

Would I be wrong?

And not entirely no

But that doesn't change we reap a stupid amount of money via debt

And SAPs